From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: yamamoto@midokura.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] linux-user: glib-ify is_proc_myself
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 12:35:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKuPiul64Uu9vlHs@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210524112323.2310-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:23:23PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is neater than the original code but it does
> remove a bunch of the !strcmp's in favour of glib's more natural bool
> results. While we are at it make the function a bool return and fixup
> the fake_open function prototypes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> index e739921e86..18e953de9d 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> @@ -7987,33 +7987,27 @@ static int open_self_auxv(void *cpu_env, int fd)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int is_proc_myself(const char *filename, const char *entry)
> +static bool is_proc_myself(const char *filename, const char *entry)
> {
> - if (!strncmp(filename, "/proc/", strlen("/proc/"))) {
> + if (g_str_has_prefix(filename, "/proc/")) {
> filename += strlen("/proc/");
> - if (!strncmp(filename, "self/", strlen("self/"))) {
> + if (g_str_has_prefix(filename, "self/")) {
> filename += strlen("self/");
> - } else if (*filename >= '1' && *filename <= '9') {
> - char myself[80];
> - snprintf(myself, sizeof(myself), "%d/", getpid());
> - if (!strncmp(filename, myself, strlen(myself))) {
> - filename += strlen(myself);
> - } else {
> - return 0;
> + } else if (g_ascii_isdigit(*filename)) {
> + g_autofree char * myself = g_strdup_printf("%d/", getpid());
> + if (!g_str_has_prefix(filename, myself)) {
> + return false;
> }
> - } else {
> - return 0;
> - }
> - if (!strcmp(filename, entry)) {
> - return 1;
> + filename += strlen(myself);
> }
> + return g_str_has_prefix(filename, entry);
> }
> - return 0;
> + return false;
> }
Diff is hard to compare, so this is what it looks like:
static bool is_proc_myself(const char *filename, const char *entry)
{
if (g_str_has_prefix(filename, "/proc/")) {
filename += strlen("/proc/");
if (g_str_has_prefix(filename, "self/")) {
filename += strlen("self/");
} else if (g_ascii_isdigit(*filename)) {
g_autofree char * myself = g_strdup_printf("%d/", getpid());
if (!g_str_has_prefix(filename, myself)) {
return false;
}
filename += strlen(myself);
}
return g_str_has_prefix(filename, entry);
}
return false;
}
I think if we don't mind two heap allocs it can be simplified to:
static int is_proc_myself(const char *filename, const char *entry)
{
g_autofree char *procself = g_strdup_printf("/proc/self/%s", entry);
g_autofree char *procpid = g_strdup_printf("/proc/%d/%s", getpid(), entry);
return g_str_equal(filename, procself) || g_str_equal(filename, procpid);
}
This makes me wonder if the code needs to cope with non-canonicalized
filenames though. eg /proc///self/maps or /proc/./self/maps
Is something further up ensuring canonicalization of 'filename' ?
>
> #if defined(HOST_WORDS_BIGENDIAN) != defined(TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN) || \
> defined(TARGET_SPARC) || defined(TARGET_M68K) || defined(TARGET_HPPA)
> -static int is_proc(const char *filename, const char *entry)
> +static bool is_proc(const char *filename, const char *entry)
> {
> return strcmp(filename, entry) == 0;
> }
> @@ -8097,7 +8091,7 @@ static int do_openat(void *cpu_env, int dirfd, const char *pathname, int flags,
> struct fake_open {
> const char *filename;
> int (*fill)(void *cpu_env, int fd);
> - int (*cmp)(const char *s1, const char *s2);
> + bool (*cmp)(const char *s1, const char *s2);
> };
> const struct fake_open *fake_open;
> static const struct fake_open fakes[] = {
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 11:23 [RFC PATCH] linux-user: glib-ify is_proc_myself Alex Bennée
2021-05-24 11:27 ` no-reply
2021-05-24 11:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-05-24 12:35 ` Alex Bennée
2021-05-24 19:12 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKuPiul64Uu9vlHs@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yamamoto@midokura.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).