qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: iotest 233 failing
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 22:31:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMKEonz0KpiOEVmq@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210610203446.2okmirg7jlt2khwm@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:34:46PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> I'm now getting failures on iotest 233:
> 
> 233   fail       [15:26:01] [15:26:03]   2.1s   (last: 1.3s)  output mismatch (see 233.out.bad)
> --- /home/eblake/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/233.out
> +++ 233.out.bad
> @@ -65,6 +65,6 @@
>  == final server log ==
>  qemu-nbd: option negotiation failed: Verify failed: No certificate was found.
>  qemu-nbd: option negotiation failed: Verify failed: No certificate was found.
> -qemu-nbd: option negotiation failed: TLS x509 authz check for CN=localhost,O=Cthulhu Dark Lord Enterprises client1,L=R'lyeh,C=South Pacific is denied
> -qemu-nbd: option negotiation failed: TLS x509 authz check for CN=localhost,O=Cthulhu Dark Lord Enterprises client3,L=R'lyeh,C=South Pacific is denied
> +qemu-nbd: option negotiation failed: TLS x509 authz check for C=South Pacific,L=R'lyeh,O=Cthulhu Dark Lord Enterprises client1,CN=localhost is denied
> +qemu-nbd: option negotiation failed: TLS x509 authz check for C=South Pacific,L=R'lyeh,O=Cthulhu Dark Lord Enterprises client3,CN=localhost is denied
>  *** done
> Failures: 233
> Failed 1 of 1 iotests
> 
> Looks like I recently updated to gnutls-3.7.2-1.fc34 on June 1, could
> that be the culprit for the error message being reordered?

It is possible I guess. They have indeed made such a change in the past
and reverted it when I pointed out that this is effectively an ABI for
apps, because access control lists are based on matching the distinguish
name string, as an opaque string. The cause certainly needs investigating
as a matter of urgency because this is ABI for QEMU's authz access control
lists.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-10 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-10 20:34 iotest 233 failing Eric Blake
2021-06-10 21:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-06-10 21:33   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-06-11  9:17     ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YMKEonz0KpiOEVmq@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).