From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] migration: Unregister yank if migration setup fails
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:51:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNtPhdww6YwHq1CL@t490s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210629050522.147057-1-leobras@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 02:05:23AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Currently, if a qemu instance is started with "-incoming defer" and
> an incorect parameter is passed to "migrate_incoming", it will print the
> expected error and reply with "duplicate yank instance" for any upcoming
> "migrate_incoming" command.
>
> This renders current qemu process unusable, and requires a new qemu
> process to be started before accepting a migration.
>
> This is caused by a yank_register_instance() that happens in
> qemu_start_incoming_migration() but is never reverted if any error
> happens.
>
> Solves this by unregistering the instance if anything goes wrong
> in the function, allowing a new "migrate_incoming" command to be
> accepted.
>
> Fixes: b5eea99ec2f ("migration: Add yank feature", 2021-01-13)
> Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974366
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Add ERRP_GUARD() at the beginning of the function, so it deals with
> errp passed as NULL, and does correct error propagation.
> ---
> migration/migration.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index 4228635d18..af0c72609f 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ void migrate_add_address(SocketAddress *address)
>
> static void qemu_start_incoming_migration(const char *uri, Error **errp)
> {
> + ERRP_GUARD();
> const char *p = NULL;
>
> if (!yank_register_instance(MIGRATION_YANK_INSTANCE, errp)) {
> @@ -474,9 +475,13 @@ static void qemu_start_incoming_migration(const char *uri, Error **errp)
> } else if (strstart(uri, "fd:", &p)) {
> fd_start_incoming_migration(p, errp);
> } else {
> - yank_unregister_instance(MIGRATION_YANK_INSTANCE);
> error_setg(errp, "unknown migration protocol: %s", uri);
> }
> +
> + if (*errp) {
> + yank_unregister_instance(MIGRATION_YANK_INSTANCE);
> + }
> +
> }
>
> static void process_incoming_migration_bh(void *opaque)
> --
Leo,
The patch looks great to me, thanks.
Though I found that maybe we need to fix it in another way due to some other
reason out of scope of this issue. The problem is today I encountered another
yank crashing qemu when trying to do postcopy recover twice.
The problem here is both initial incoming migration and postcopy recovery uses
qemu_start_incoming_migration(), while in qmp_migrate_recover() b5eea99ec2f5c
calls unregister before calling qemu_start_incoming_migration(). I believe it
wanted to mitigate the next call to yank_register_instance() to make it work,
but I think that's wrong...
Firstly, if during recover, we should keep the yank instance there, not
"quickly removing and adding it back". Meanwhile, as I mentioned calling
qmp_migrate_recover() twice with b5eea99ec2f5c will directly crash the dest
qemu because the 1st call of qmp_migrate_recover() will unregister permanently
when channel failed to establish, then the 2nd call of qmp_migrate_recover()
crashes at yank_unregister_instance().
I'll post an alternative fix of this issue (plus another postcopy recovery fix)
to show better on what I meant.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-29 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-29 5:05 [PATCH v2 1/1] migration: Unregister yank if migration setup fails Leonardo Bras
2021-06-29 9:25 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-29 16:51 ` Peter Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNtPhdww6YwHq1CL@t490s \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=lukasstraub2@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).