From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: don't block getters for resource control syscalls
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:13:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNymLV4m+B58rvek@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210630160526.977225-1-berrange@redhat.com>
* Daniel P. Berrangé (berrange@redhat.com) wrote:
> Recent GLibC calls sched_getaffinity in code paths related to malloc and
> when QEMU blocks access, it sends it off into a bad codepath resulting
> in stack exhaustion[1]. The GLibC bug is being fixed[2], but none the
> less, GLibC has valid reasons to want to use sched_getaffinity.
>
> It is not unreasonable for code to want to run many resource syscalls
> for information gathering, so it is a bit too harsh for QEMU to block
> them.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975693
> [2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-June/128271.html
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> ---
> softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c b/softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c
> index 9c29d9cf00..f50026778c 100644
> --- a/softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c
> +++ b/softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c
> @@ -97,17 +97,11 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall denylist[] = {
> { SCMP_SYS(vfork), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_SPAWN },
> { SCMP_SYS(execve), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_SPAWN },
> /* resource control */
> - { SCMP_SYS(getpriority), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
> { SCMP_SYS(setpriority), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
> { SCMP_SYS(sched_setparam), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
> - { SCMP_SYS(sched_getparam), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
> { SCMP_SYS(sched_setscheduler), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL,
> ARRAY_SIZE(sched_setscheduler_arg), sched_setscheduler_arg },
> - { SCMP_SYS(sched_getscheduler), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
> { SCMP_SYS(sched_setaffinity), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
> - { SCMP_SYS(sched_getaffinity), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
> - { SCMP_SYS(sched_get_priority_max), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
> - { SCMP_SYS(sched_get_priority_min), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
> };
>
> static inline __attribute__((unused)) int
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 16:05 [PATCH] seccomp: don't block getters for resource control syscalls Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-06-30 17:13 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2021-07-01 7:15 ` Eduardo Otubo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNymLV4m+B58rvek@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=otubo@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).