From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Wen Congyang <wencongyang2@huawei.com>,
Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] job: replace AioContext lock with job_mutex
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:14:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YObsNCPx3/S/i72O@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6dadca95-632a-61fa-4a91-c2df25e19b52@redhat.com>
Am 08.07.2021 um 13:32 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 08/07/21 12:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > What is very clear from this patch is that it
> > > is strictly related to the brdv_* and lower level calls, because
> > > they also internally check or even use the aiocontext lock.
> > > Therefore, in order to make it work, I temporarly added some
> > > aiocontext_acquire/release pair around the function that
> > > still assert for them or assume they are hold and temporarly
> > > unlock (unlock() - lock()).
> >
> > Sounds like the issue is that this patch series assumes AioContext locks
> > are no longer required for calling the blk_*()/bdrv_*() APIs? That is
> > not the case yet, so you had to then add those aio_context_lock() calls
> > back in elsewhere. This approach introduces unnecessary risk. I think we
> > should wait until blk_*()/bdrv_*() no longer requires the caller to hold
> > the AioContext lock before applying this series.
>
> In general I'm in favor of pushing the lock further down into smaller and
> smaller critical sections; it's a good approach to make further audits
> easier until it's "obvious" that the lock is unnecessary. I haven't yet
> reviewed Emanuele's patches to see if this is what he's doing where he's
> adding the acquire/release calls, but that's my understanding of both his
> cover letter and your reply.
>
> The I/O blk_*()/bdrv_*() *should* not require the caller to hold the
> AioContext lock; all drivers use their own CoMutex or QemuMutex when needed,
> and generic code should also be ready (caveat emptor). Others, such as
> reopen, are a mess that requires a separate audit. Restricting
> acquire/release to be only around those seems like a good starting point.
Reopen isn't just a mess, but in fact buggy. After the following patch
goes in, the rule is simple: Don't hold any AioContext locks when
calling bdrv_reopen_multiple().
'block: Acquire AioContexts during bdrv_reopen_multiple()'
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-07/msg00238.html
It still takes AioContext locks when it calls into other functions that
currently expect it, but that should be the same as usual then.
And once callers don't even hold the lock in the first place, we'll also
get rid of the ugly temporary lock release across reopen.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-07 16:58 [RFC PATCH 0/6] job: replace AioContext lock with job_mutex Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-07 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] job: use getter/setters instead of accessing the Job fields directly Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-07 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] job: _locked functions and public job_lock/unlock for next patch Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-08 10:50 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-12 8:43 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-13 13:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-07 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] job: minor changes to simplify locking Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-08 10:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-12 8:43 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-13 17:56 ` Eric Blake
2021-07-07 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] job.h: categorize job fields Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-08 11:02 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-12 8:43 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-07 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] job: use global job_mutex to protect struct Job Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-08 12:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-12 8:43 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-07 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] jobs: remove unnecessary AioContext aquire/release pairs Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-08 10:36 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] job: replace AioContext lock with job_mutex Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-08 11:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-08 12:14 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2021-07-08 13:04 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-12 8:41 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-13 13:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-13 15:18 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-07-13 16:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-15 12:35 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-07-15 13:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-16 15:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-07-19 9:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-19 14:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-07-08 13:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-12 8:42 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-07-13 13:27 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YObsNCPx3/S/i72O@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=wencongyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=xiechanglong.d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).