From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] memory: Add tracepoint for dirty sync
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:05:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRveXqqR+DELQVSe@t490s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43b42f6e-f2a2-6341-0c53-bcf1586fb191@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:25:56AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 17.08.21 03:37, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Trace at memory_region_sync_dirty_bitmap() for log_sync() or global_log_sync()
> > on memory regions. One trace line should suffice when it finishes, so as to
> > estimate the time used for each log sync process.
>
> I wonder if a start/finish would be even nicer. At least it wouldn't really
> result in significantly more code changes :)
Note that the "name"s I added is not only for not using start/end, it's about
knowing which memory listener is slow. Start/end won't achieve that if we
don't have a name for them. So far I just wanted to identify majorly kvm,
vhost and kvm-smram, however it'll always be good when some log_sync is missed
when tracing.
I'm also wondering whether kvm-smram needs a whole bitmap as I don't know what
RAM would be touched within system manager mode (as I thought it should only
touch a very limited range and should be defined somewhere), but that's
off-topic.
If we want to make it start/end pair, I can do that too. But the 1st patch
will still be wanted.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-17 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-17 1:35 [PATCH RESEND 0/2] memory: Add tracepoints for log_sync Peter Xu
2021-08-17 1:35 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] memory: Name all the memory listeners Peter Xu
2021-08-17 7:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-17 1:37 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] memory: Add tracepoint for dirty sync Peter Xu
2021-08-17 7:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-17 16:05 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2021-08-17 16:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-20 13:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-20 12:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRveXqqR+DELQVSe@t490s \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).