From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] docs/devel: document expectations for QAPI data modelling for QMP
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 13:46:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YTtTwwXjG9/u653o@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tuium6u7.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:33:20AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Traditionally we have required that newly added QMP commands will model
> > any returned data using fine grained QAPI types. This is good for
> > commands that are intended to be consumed by machines, where clear data
> > representation is very important. Commands that don't satisfy this have
> > generally been added to HMP only.
> >
> > In effect the decision of whether to add a new command to QMP vs HMP has
> > been used as a proxy for the decision of whether the cost of designing a
> > fine grained QAPI type is justified by the potential benefits.
> >
> > As a result the commands present in QMP and HMP are non-overlapping
> > sets, although HMP comamnds can be accessed indirectly via the QMP
> > command 'human-monitor-command'.
> >
> > One of the downsides of 'human-monitor-command' is that the QEMU monitor
> > APIs remain tied into various internal parts of the QEMU code. For
> > example any exclusively HMP command will need to use 'monitor_printf'
> > to get data out. It would be desirable to be able to fully isolate the
> > monitor implementation from QEMU internals, however, this is only
> > possible if all commands are exclusively based on QAPI with direct
> > QMP exposure.
> >
> > The way to achieve this desired end goal is to finese the requirements
> > for QMP command design. For cases where the output of a command is only
> > intended for human consumption, it is reasonable to want to simplify
> > the implementation by returning a plain string containing formatted
> > data instead of designing a fine grained QAPI data type. This can be
> > permitted if-and-only-if the command is exposed under the 'x-' name
> > prefix. This indicates that the command data format is liable to
> > future change and that it is not following QAPI design best practice.
> >
> > The poster child example for this would be the 'info registers' HMP
> > command which returns printf formatted data representing CPU state.
> > This information varies enourmously across target architectures and
> > changes relatively frequently as new CPU features are implemented.
> > It is there as debugging data for human operators, and any machine
> > usage would treat it as an opaque blob. It is thus reasonable to
> > expose this in QMP as 'x-query-registers' returning a 'str' field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > docs/devel/writing-qmp-commands.rst | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > +QAPI types. As a general guide, a caller of the QMP command should never need
> > +to parse individual returned data fields. If a field appears to need parsing,
> > +them it should be split into separate fields corresponding to each distinct
> > +data item. This should be the common case for any new QMP command that is
> > +intended to be used by machines, as opposed to exclusively human operators.
> > +
> > +Some QMP commands, however, are only intended as adhoc debugging aids for human
> > +operators. While they may return large amounts of formatted data, it is not
> > +expected that machines will need to parse the result. The overhead of defining
> > +a fine grained QAPI type for the data may not be justified by the potential
> > +benefit. In such cases, it is permitted to have a command return a simple string
>
> There are many existing long lines in this file, so I'm not flagging
> yours, except for this one, because it increases the maximum.
This line is at exactly 80 characters so checkstyle is happy with it.
We don't have any requirement for a differenet line limit for docs
afair ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-08 10:37 [PATCH 0/5] Stop adding HMP-only commands, allow QMP for all Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 10:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] docs/devel: document expectations for QAPI data modelling for QMP Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 17:42 ` Eric Blake
2021-09-09 9:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-09-10 12:46 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-09-10 13:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-09-10 13:52 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 10:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/core: introduce 'format_state' callback to replace 'dump_state' Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 10:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] target/i386: convert to use format_state instead of dump_state Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 12:17 ` Ján Tomko
2021-09-08 18:05 ` Eric Blake
2021-09-08 22:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-09 9:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 10:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] qapi: introduce x-query-registers QMP command Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 18:06 ` Eric Blake
2021-09-09 9:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-09-09 10:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 10:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] monitor: rewrite 'info registers' in terms of 'x-query-registers' Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 11:01 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-08 11:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 12:18 ` [PATCH 0/5] Stop adding HMP-only commands, allow QMP for all Ján Tomko
2021-09-08 15:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-09-08 15:24 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-09 4:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-09-09 8:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-09-09 8:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-08 16:15 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-09 6:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YTtTwwXjG9/u653o@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).