From: "Jose R. Ziviani" <jziviani@suse.de>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] meson: introduce modules_arch
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:02:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUiGcjBviIqPIyJB@pizza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210920051532.tzanl2asdqzuxlzn@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1380 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 07:15:32AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Yes, I really like your approach, makes more sense indeed. But, how do I
> > get the core modules that other modules depend on?
> >
> > I see that Kconfig already has something in this line:
> >
> > config VGA (from hw/display)
> > bool
> >
> > config PCI (from hw/pci)
> > bool
> >
> > config QXL (from hw/display)
> > bool
> > depends on SPICE && PCI
> > select VGA
> >
> > I assume that independent entries (like VGA and PCI) are core and that I
> > can rely on it to add
> > module_need(PCI)
> > module_need(VGA)
> > for hw-display-qxl. Am I right?
>
> Yes, looking at kconfig for core dependencies makes sense.
But, in anyway, I'll still need to store the target architecture that
can use such core module, like I did here in this patch. Otherwise,
if I compile different targets at the same time, I'll end up with the
same problem of targets trying to load wrong modules.
I thought of using qom, but I think it will pollute module.c.
What do you think if I simply create one modinfo.c per target, like
modinfo-s390x.c, modinfo-avr.c, etc? Each will only have the data
structure filled with the right modules and linked only to its own
qemu-system-arch.
Best regards,
Jose R Ziviani
>
> take care,
> Gerd
>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-20 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-17 1:29 [PATCH 0/2] modules: Improve modinfo.c architecture support Jose R. Ziviani
2021-09-17 1:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] meson: introduce modules_arch Jose R. Ziviani
2021-09-17 7:14 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-17 13:06 ` Jose R. Ziviani
2021-09-20 5:15 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-20 13:02 ` Jose R. Ziviani [this message]
2021-09-20 19:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-21 13:46 ` Jose R. Ziviani
2021-09-23 7:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-21 5:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-21 13:35 ` Jose R. Ziviani
2021-09-21 15:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-17 1:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] modules: use a list of supported arch for each module Jose R. Ziviani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YUiGcjBviIqPIyJB@pizza \
--to=jziviani@suse.de \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).