qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/14] machine: Prefer cores over sockets in smp parsing since 6.2
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:21:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVLsj7G+vSjXph4c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210928035755.11684-9-wangyanan55@huawei.com>

On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:57:49AM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> In the real SMP hardware topology world, it's much more likely that
> we have high cores-per-socket counts and few sockets totally. While
> the current preference of sockets over cores in smp parsing results
> in a virtual cpu topology with low cores-per-sockets counts and a
> large number of sockets, which is just contrary to the real world.
> 
> Given that it is better to make the virtual cpu topology be more
> reflective of the real world and also for the sake of compatibility,
> we start to prefer cores over sockets over threads in smp parsing
> since machine type 6.2 for different arches.
> 
> In this patch, a boolean "smp_prefer_sockets" is added, and we only
> enable the old preference on older machines and enable the new one
> since type 6.2 for all arches by using the machine compat mechanism.
> 
> Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@ionos.com>
> ---
>  hw/arm/virt.c              |  1 +
>  hw/core/machine.c          | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  hw/i386/pc.c               | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  hw/i386/pc_piix.c          |  1 +
>  hw/i386/pc_q35.c           |  1 +
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c             |  1 +
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c |  1 +
>  include/hw/boards.h        |  1 +
>  qemu-options.hx            |  3 ++-
>  9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-28 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-28  3:57 [PATCH v11 00/14] machine: smp parsing fixes and improvement Yanan Wang
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 01/14] machine: Deprecate "parameter=0" SMP configurations Yanan Wang
2021-09-28  9:58   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 11:15     ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 02/14] machine: Minor refactor/fix for the smp parsers Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:06   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] machine: Uniformly use maxcpus to calculate the omitted parameters Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:09   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] machine: Set the value of cpus to match maxcpus if it's omitted Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:10   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] machine: Improve the error reporting of smp parsing Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:13   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 10:50   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] qtest/numa-test: Use detailed -smp CLIs in pc_dynamic_cpu_cfg Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:17   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 10:51   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] qtest/numa-test: Use detailed -smp CLIs in test_def_cpu_split Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:19   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 10:51   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] machine: Prefer cores over sockets in smp parsing since 6.2 Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:21   ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] machine: Use ms instead of global current_machine in sanity-check Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:21   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 10:52   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] machine: Tweak the order of topology members in struct CpuTopology Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:23   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 10:58   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] machine: Make smp_parse generic enough for all arches Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:25   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 10:57   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28 10:58     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 11:02       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28 11:07       ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-09-28 12:25     ` Markus Armbruster
2021-09-28 12:53       ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] machine: Remove smp_parse callback from MachineClass Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:25   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 10:58   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] machine: Move smp_prefer_sockets to struct SMPCompatProps Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:26   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28  3:57 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] machine: Put all sanity-check in the generic SMP parser Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:38   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 11:01   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28 11:20     ` wangyanan (Y)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YVLsj7G+vSjXph4c@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).