From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: "Sohil Mehta" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@intel.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Randy E Witt <randy.e.witt@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] x86 User Interrupts support
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:35:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVc47ohb4nxrBO5h@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <778d40fe-ad8e-fd7c-4caa-499910bb0925@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2018 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:24:24AM -0700, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>
> On 9/30/2021 9:30 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 09:31:34PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >
> > > I spent some time reviewing the docs (ISE) and contemplating how this all fits together, and I have a high level question:
> > >
> > > Can someone give an example of a realistic workload that would benefit from SENDUIPI and precisely how it would use SENDUIPI? Or an example of a realistic workload that would benefit from hypothetical device-initiated user interrupts and how it would use them? I'm having trouble imagining something that wouldn't work as well or better by simply polling, at least on DMA-coherent architectures like x86.
> > I was wondering the same thing. One thing came to mind:
> >
> > An application that wants to be *interrupted* from what it's doing
> > rather than waiting until the next polling point. For example,
> > applications that are CPU-intensive and have green threads. I can't name
> > a real application like this though :P.
>
> Thank you Stefan and Andy for giving this some thought.
>
> We are consolidating the information internally on where and how exactly we
> expect to see benefits with real workloads for the various sources of User
> Interrupts. It will take a few days to get back on this one.
One possible use case came to mind in QEMU's TCG just-in-time compiler:
QEMU's TCG threads execute translated code. There are events that
require interrupting these threads. Today a check is performed at the
start of every translated block. Most of the time the check is false and
it's a waste of CPU.
User interrupts can eliminate the need for checks by interrupting TCG
threads when events occur.
I don't know whether this will improve performance or how feasible it is
to implement, but I've added people who might have ideas. (For a summary
of user interrupts, see
https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/871113/60652640e11fc5df/.)
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-01 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210913200132.3396598-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com>
[not found] ` <456bf9cf-87b8-4c3d-ac0c-7e392bcf26de@www.fastmail.com>
[not found] ` <YVXmGTo5Uzp44QQq@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
[not found] ` <778d40fe-ad8e-fd7c-4caa-499910bb0925@intel.com>
2021-10-01 16:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2021-10-01 16:41 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] x86 User Interrupts support Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVc47ohb4nxrBO5h@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=gayatri.kammela@intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ramesh.thomas@intel.com \
--cc=randy.e.witt@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).