From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275F6C433EF for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A68A760FC0 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:42:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org A68A760FC0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:39816 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfiGC-0004dj-FP for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:42:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfi8M-0005a9-0P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:34:22 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:41343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfi8K-0006tQ-2K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:34:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635338059; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=e78TOZ+5+gXSFINAOlo3wXkIRqkiHHuPAowRV3KzL50=; b=RW1srbFxDLPt66duclZokojfFAnzjGtrKEgySx44ELk4H7M9uPzzeySt3bJ4L4V7nMvMbx RMNZmTLlZhtJqRUxuym14jrdzVdursxpLhV45fRcVhMlZdsga+bcWVQmL2NVSkGbXaGVjm N8+JuUhm8Igae8QxRZ3LlE/Xdm5hGFM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-320-rUsPlyVGP76b20m1g0oYfg-1; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:34:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rUsPlyVGP76b20m1g0oYfg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF6EA40D6; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.39.195.112]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70135C232; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:34:09 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] gitlab-ci: Only push docker images to mainstream registry from /master Message-ID: References: <20211026145509.1029274-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20211027122658.ieazn3sykshtlth4@sirius.home.kraxel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211027122658.ieazn3sykshtlth4@sirius.home.kraxel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.7 (2021-05-04) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Michael Roth , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Willian Rampazzo , Stefan Hajnoczi , Cleber Rosa , Bin Meng , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:26:58PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > Notably the latter is more restrictive that git branch names. We could > > assume users always have "sensible" branch names that are less than > > 128 chars and only alpha-num characters plus dash/underscore. This > > would be fine for my personal branch naming, but I wonder if anyone > > uses wierd branch names that would violate docker tag name rules ? > > /me uses slashes in branch names, i.e. > > queue/$topic for patch queues > $hostname/$subject for my development branches. Ok, good to know. So that example clearly rules out use of git branch names as docker tags. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|