From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spapr_numa.c: FORM2 table handle nodes with no distance info
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:26:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYiY98VGqqLRxf5N@yekko> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555804ca-e59e-6dfb-c133-0087b7c0ffd0@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3735 bytes --]
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:52:13PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 11/5/21 10:51, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > A configuration that specifies multiple nodes without distance info
> > results in the non-local points in the FORM2 matrix having a distance of
> > 0. This causes Linux to complain "Invalid distance value range" because
> > a node distance is smaller than the local distance.
> >
> > Fix this by building a simple local / remote fallback for points where
> > distance information is missing.
>
> Thanks for looking this up. I checked the output of this same scenario with
> a FORM1 guest and 4 distance-less NUMA nodes. This is what I got:
>
> [root@localhost ~]# numactl -H
> available: 4 nodes (0-3)
> (...)
> node distances:
> node 0 1 2 3
> 0: 10 160 160 160
> 1: 160 10 160 160
> 2: 160 160 10 160
> 3: 160 160 160 10
> [root@localhost ~]#
>
>
> With this patch we're getting '20' instead of '160' because you're using
> NUMA_DISTANCE_DEFAULT, while FORM1 will default this case to the maximum
> NUMA distance the kernel allows for that affinity (160).
>
> I do not have strong feelings about changing this behavior between FORM1 and
> FORM2. I tested the same scenario with a x86_64 guest and they also uses '20'
> in this case as well, so far as QEMU goes using NUMA_DISTANCE_DEFAULT is
> consistent.
>
> Aneesh is already in CC, so I believe he'll let us know if there's something
> we're missing and we need to preserve the '160' distance in FORM2 for this
> case as well.
>
> For now:
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Applied to ppc-for-6.2, thanks.
>
>
>
> > hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
> > index 5822938448..56ab2a5fb6 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
> > @@ -546,12 +546,24 @@ static void spapr_numa_FORM2_write_rtas_tables(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> > * NUMA nodes, but QEMU adds the default NUMA node without
> > * adding the numa_info to retrieve distance info from.
> > */
> > - if (src == dst) {
> > - distance_table[i++] = NUMA_DISTANCE_MIN;
> > - continue;
> > + distance_table[i] = numa_info[src].distance[dst];
> > + if (distance_table[i] == 0) {
> > + /*
> > + * In case QEMU adds a default NUMA single node when the user
> > + * did not add any, or where the user did not supply distances,
> > + * the value will be 0 here. Populate the table with a fallback
> > + * simple local / remote distance.
> > + */
> > + if (src == dst) {
> > + distance_table[i] = NUMA_DISTANCE_MIN;
> > + } else {
> > + distance_table[i] = numa_info[src].distance[dst];
> > + if (distance_table[i] < NUMA_DISTANCE_MIN) {
> > + distance_table[i] = NUMA_DISTANCE_DEFAULT;
> > + }
> > + }
> > }
> > -
> > - distance_table[i++] = numa_info[src].distance[dst];
> > + i++;
> > }
> > }
> >
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-05 13:51 [PATCH] spapr_numa.c: FORM2 table handle nodes with no distance info Nicholas Piggin
2021-11-05 18:52 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-11-08 3:26 ` David Gibson [this message]
2021-11-08 4:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-11-08 13:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-11-08 21:12 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YYiY98VGqqLRxf5N@yekko \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).