Re: [PATCH v3 08/23] multifd: Fill offset and block for reception

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> We were using the iov directly, but we will need this info on the
> following patch.

Yes I think so;  have you considered that really need to check the
fields of MultiFD*Params to see which fields you're actually using?



Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>

> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/multifd.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
> index 55d99a8232..0533da154a 100644
> --- a/migration/multifd.c
> +++ b/migration/multifd.c
> @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static int multifd_recv_unfill_packet(MultiFDRecvParams *p, Error **errp)
>          return -1;
>      }
>  
> +    p->pages->block = block;
>      for (i = 0; i < p->pages->num; i++) {
>          uint64_t offset = be64_to_cpu(packet->offset[i]);
>  
> @@ -363,6 +364,7 @@ static int multifd_recv_unfill_packet(MultiFDRecvParams *p, Error **errp)
>                         offset, block->used_length);
>              return -1;
>          }
> +        p->pages->offset[i] = offset;
>          p->pages->iov[i].iov_base = block->host + offset;
>          p->pages->iov[i].iov_len = page_size;
>      }
> -- 
> 2.33.1
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK