Re: Give the fosshost.org VM a purpose or a retirement

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 03:55:55PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 11/24/21 15:16, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Fosshost.org was kind enough to supply the QEMU project with a public
> > VM hosted by them.  The original use case we anticipated was to set up
> > a GitLab CI runner, because we assumed the VM was KVM capable, but
> > that turned out not to be the case.
> > 
> > So, at this point, adding it as a GitLab CI runner would not add any
> > significant improvement over the shared runners already provided, and
> > it would require more maintenance effort.
> > 
> > If there are any ideas for making use of this resource, and volunteers
> > to configure and maintain it, please let me know.
> > 
> > Otherwise, it seems fair to relinquish the resource back to Fosshost.org.
> 
> Cc'ing Warner, since for FreeBSD testing we use Cirrus-CI (via
> libvirt-ci and have sometime hit GitLab timeout)

We're not seeing timeouts since we dropped the redundant jobs that
were running on master.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|