From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00107C433F5 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38984 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mp8xu-0000As-Ic for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:02:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mp8w8-000789-Ei for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:00:44 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:38624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mp8w5-0003Ul-Ny for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:00:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1637586040; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VDyveFqvxlZwYSUS7S6JBOtkoTt6wEKkbwOcLRvWx9k=; b=gk7jK7WdpW7WSYcea8zscrmWToWQMOQ3jRXfBud433oc8Uqx4j4ro2XqebJ0vntGtVT/eO AON7noYQWRQFcPdoznC4XfJGjeabBd+hIcAa4WRZpPAhTq76V2s7BzfOfKOXq7Z7NPPa+E Xfulg8Mghuc5frBxjsXQ0Jf4TGpRyjA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-178-mmCgOlgPMUmhALmDX7rp6A-1; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:00:36 -0500 X-MC-Unique: mmCgOlgPMUmhALmDX7rp6A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF7A10247A9; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paraplu (unknown [10.39.193.57]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8179557CB9; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 12:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:59:52 +0100 From: Kashyap Chamarthy To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: Fix botched rST conversion of 'submitting-a-patch.rst' Message-ID: References: <20211119193118.949698-1-kchamart@redhat.com> <20211119193118.949698-2-kchamart@redhat.com> <56026d2a-0b9e-ff83-d953-a284a810a8ed@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kchamart@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=kchamart@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.709, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= , Eric Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , John Snow , Laurent Vivier Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:36:53PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 22/11/2021 13.19, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [...] > > I kept that because an explicit reminder about spell-check is useful; > > it's easy to forget. Another option is to retain the line, but replace > > "See also:" with "And:". Not sure if it's any better. But I don't mind > > either way. > > What about simply replacing it with a new sentence below the bullet list, > saying: > > "Please also use a spell checker like `codespell > https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell` with your patches" > > ? Sounds good to me; go for it. Thanks! -- /kashyap