From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Libvirt <libvir-list@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-7.0] i386: Deprecate the -no-hpet QEMU command line option
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:56:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya3eY0uEOvFAeB9v@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d27c47cb-e0bb-761a-e613-27be752197ac@redhat.com>
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 10:44:50AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06/12/2021 10.19, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 10:02:44 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > On 06/12/2021 09.57, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 09:47:58 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > > > On 06/12/2021 09.40, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > > > > The HPET setting has been turned into a machine property a while ago
> > > > > > already, so we should finally do the next step and deprecate the
> > > > > > legacy CLI option, too.
> > > > > > While we're at it, add a proper help text for the machine property, too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > docs/about/deprecated.rst | 6 ++++++
> > > > > > hw/i386/pc.c | 2 ++
> > > > > > qemu-options.hx | 2 +-
> > > > > > softmmu/vl.c | 1 +
> > > > > > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> > > > > > index 5693abb663..1dfe69aa6a 100644
> > > > > > --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> > > > > > +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> > > > > > @@ -198,6 +198,12 @@ form is preferred.
> > > > > > Using ``-drive if=none`` to configure the OTP device of the sifive_u
> > > > > > RISC-V machine is deprecated. Use ``-drive if=pflash`` instead.
> > > > > > +``-no-hpet`` (since 7.0)
> > > > > > +''''''''''''''''''''''''
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +The HPET setting has been turned into a machine property.
> > > > > > +Use ``-machine hpet=off`` instead.
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > Forgot to CC: the libvirt folks, doing so now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Seems like libvirt is still using -no-hpet in some few spots, so I guess
> > > > > these would need to be changed first, before we could finally remove this
> > > > > option in QEMU?
> > > >
> > > > Yes we need to switch to the new property first.
> > > >
> > > > Is the new way via -machine property by any chance usable with
> > > > qemu-2.11? If yes, then we can do it unconditionally, otherwise we'll
> > > > need a witness to detect the support for the new flag as a qemu
> > > > capability.
> > >
> > > The machine property has been added just a year ago:
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/0259c78ca79
> > >
> > > So it's just available on QEMU v5.2.0 and newer.
> >
> > Okay, so we can't unfortunately always use the new way.
> >
> > I had a brief look in what libvirt queries to build the capability list
> > and unfortunately neither query-command-line-options nor query-machines
> > list anything which we could detect.
> >
> > Since only the config knob is changing the presence in qom-list-types
> > doesn't help either.
> >
> > So if qemu want's to deprecate the '-no-hpet' spelling we need something
> > which we can detect by one of the above means or other probe command to
> > use the new spelling.
>
> I just had another chat with Peter on IRC, and seems like it could be
> detected by running "qom-list-properties" on e.g. the "generic-pc-machine"
> object. However, libvirt does not have that information in their test data
> yet, so it's not a very trivial change to support this in libvirt.
It is mostly just a tedious matter of getting sample QMP replies for
the qom-list-properties command on various older QEMU versions to
make sure our test suite does the right thing.
> Thus, please don't merge this patch yet, it will currently cause more hassle
> than benefit.
I don't see any problem in QEMU going ahead with this. If it is deprecated
in 7.0, then it won't be until 7.2 that its deleted, which is Dec 2022
timeframe. A year is enough time for libvirt to adapt.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-06 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-06 8:40 [PATCH for-7.0] i386: Deprecate the -no-hpet QEMU command line option Thomas Huth
2021-12-06 8:47 ` Thomas Huth
2021-12-06 8:57 ` Peter Krempa
2021-12-06 9:02 ` Thomas Huth
2021-12-06 9:19 ` Peter Krempa
2021-12-06 9:44 ` Thomas Huth
2021-12-06 9:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ya3eY0uEOvFAeB9v@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).