From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67335C433F5 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 11:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40058 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msjx1-0001VN-4F for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 06:08:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msjvP-00088S-EG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 06:06:53 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:56130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msjvH-0001mA-IB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 06:06:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1638443202; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r8yCvZDhikKKiQhNQ6CiTgaPn0vhiyTDC3QGvn6y0nk=; b=AKhhFLyonSYxQKHvBxo1qPz2zUJihnAw6v3cVymJ21MNpIlycM7aNN36Yn0AK9I4nCwxSN /iFk3gBnHsOYNSmoLwKRQ+Q1DoLEJPTSFsS1GHNGEDTKLxeUebf9hC1VWoMtDoWT4sfqTM u1TDb/FdK/T5T+vv4jmJ9jmCP36tWFE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-272-MfFzpppgOCeU8jPXmZIkTw-1; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 06:06:35 -0500 X-MC-Unique: MfFzpppgOCeU8jPXmZIkTw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 854B31014B4E; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 11:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.33.36.139]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C953A5F4E7; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 11:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 11:06:20 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH] edid: set default resolution to 1280x800 (WXGA) Message-ID: References: <20211129140508.1745130-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.3 (2021-09-10) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.719, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 11:00:53AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > This patch thus suggests a modest change to 1280x800 (WXGA). > > Does this change need to be versioned so as to not change > behaviour for older machine types ? I don't think the EDID defaults change needs it. It just means that VM will get a updated res next time it queries EDID, which should be OK. The virtio-gpu change I'm not so sure about - it feeds into the EDID code, but not sure if it has other consequences that matter from a guest ABI pov. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|