qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: den@openvz.org, hreitz@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iotests: check: multiprocessing support
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 15:36:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbNl6BA0shsS6TX1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203122223.2780098-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

Am 03.12.2021 um 13:22 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> Add -j <JOBS> parameter, to run tests in several jobs simultaneously.
> For realization - simply utilize multiprocessing.Pool class.
> 
> Notes:
> 
> 1. Of course, tests can't run simultaneously in same TEST_DIR. So,
>    use subdirectories TEST_DIR/testname/ and SOCK_DIR/testname/
>    instead of simply TEST_DIR and SOCK_DIR
> 
> 2. multiprocessing.Pool.starmap function doesn't support passing
>    context managers, so we can't simply pass "self". Happily, we need
>    self only for read-only access, and it just works if it is defined
>    in global space. So, add a temporary link TestRunner.shared_self
>    during run_tests().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

Just wondering, is it worth even supporting the mp=false case or can we
simplify the code a bit by always going through multiprocessing and
using nice directory names even if only one process is spawned?

Maybe John's observation that directory names get longer might be a
reason not to do that by default. Any other reasons you're aware of?

Kevin



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-10 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03 12:22 [PATCH 0/3] iotests: multiprocessing!! Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-03 12:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] iotests/testrunner.py: add doc string for run_test() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 17:52   ` John Snow
2021-12-10 14:12   ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-10 14:40     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-03 12:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] iotests/testrunner.py: move updating last_elapsed to run_tests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 17:59   ` John Snow
2021-12-10 14:25     ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-10 14:47       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-10 20:05         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-03 12:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] iotests: check: multiprocessing support Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 18:35   ` John Snow
2021-12-06 20:20     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 21:00       ` John Snow
2021-12-10 14:36   ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2021-12-10 14:46     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-10 16:26       ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-06 18:37 ` [PATCH 0/3] iotests: multiprocessing!! John Snow
2021-12-06 20:26   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-07 18:20     ` John Snow
2021-12-09 14:33 ` Hanna Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YbNl6BA0shsS6TX1@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).