From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: den@openvz.org, hreitz@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iotests: check: multiprocessing support
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 15:36:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbNl6BA0shsS6TX1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203122223.2780098-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Am 03.12.2021 um 13:22 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> Add -j <JOBS> parameter, to run tests in several jobs simultaneously.
> For realization - simply utilize multiprocessing.Pool class.
>
> Notes:
>
> 1. Of course, tests can't run simultaneously in same TEST_DIR. So,
> use subdirectories TEST_DIR/testname/ and SOCK_DIR/testname/
> instead of simply TEST_DIR and SOCK_DIR
>
> 2. multiprocessing.Pool.starmap function doesn't support passing
> context managers, so we can't simply pass "self". Happily, we need
> self only for read-only access, and it just works if it is defined
> in global space. So, add a temporary link TestRunner.shared_self
> during run_tests().
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Just wondering, is it worth even supporting the mp=false case or can we
simplify the code a bit by always going through multiprocessing and
using nice directory names even if only one process is spawned?
Maybe John's observation that directory names get longer might be a
reason not to do that by default. Any other reasons you're aware of?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-10 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 12:22 [PATCH 0/3] iotests: multiprocessing!! Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-03 12:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] iotests/testrunner.py: add doc string for run_test() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 17:52 ` John Snow
2021-12-10 14:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-10 14:40 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-03 12:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] iotests/testrunner.py: move updating last_elapsed to run_tests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 17:59 ` John Snow
2021-12-10 14:25 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-10 14:47 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-10 20:05 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-03 12:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] iotests: check: multiprocessing support Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 18:35 ` John Snow
2021-12-06 20:20 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 21:00 ` John Snow
2021-12-10 14:36 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2021-12-10 14:46 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-10 16:26 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-06 18:37 ` [PATCH 0/3] iotests: multiprocessing!! John Snow
2021-12-06 20:26 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-07 18:20 ` John Snow
2021-12-09 14:33 ` Hanna Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbNl6BA0shsS6TX1@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).