From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qapi: Cleanup SGX related comments and restore @section-size
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:44:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YekvAuBUzcfSaHiT@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120091601.GA27922@yangzhon-Virtual>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 05:16:01PM +0800, Yang Zhong wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:10:34AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 06:57:20PM -0500, Yang Zhong wrote:
> > > The SGX NUMA patches were merged into Qemu 7.0 release, we need
> > > clarify detailed version history information and also change
> > > some related comments, which make SGX related comments clearer.
> > >
> > > The QMP command schema promises backwards compatibility as standard.
> > > We temporarily restore "@section-size", which can avoid incompatible
> > > API breakage. The "@section-size" will be deprecated in 7.2 version.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > qapi/machine.json | 4 ++--
> > > qapi/misc-target.json | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> > > hw/i386/sgx.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/qapi/machine.json b/qapi/machine.json
> > > index b6a37e17c4..cf47cb63a9 100644
> > > --- a/qapi/machine.json
> > > +++ b/qapi/machine.json
> > > @@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@
> > > #
> > > # @memdev: memory backend linked with device
> > > #
> > > -# @node: the numa node
> > > +# @node: the numa node (Since: 7.0)
> > > #
> > > # Since: 6.2
> > > ##
> > > @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@
> > > #
> > > # @memdev: memory backend linked with device
> > > #
> > > -# @node: the numa node
> > > +# @node: the numa node (Since: 7.0)
> > > #
> > > # Since: 6.2
> > > ##
> > > diff --git a/qapi/misc-target.json b/qapi/misc-target.json
> > > index 1022aa0184..a87358ea44 100644
> > > --- a/qapi/misc-target.json
> > > +++ b/qapi/misc-target.json
> > > @@ -344,9 +344,9 @@
> > > #
> > > # @node: the numa node
> > > #
> > > -# @size: the size of epc section
> > > +# @size: the size of EPC section
> > > #
> > > -# Since: 6.2
> > > +# Since: 7.0
> > > ##
> > > { 'struct': 'SGXEPCSection',
> > > 'data': { 'node': 'int',
> > > @@ -365,7 +365,9 @@
> > > #
> > > # @flc: true if FLC is supported
> > > #
> > > -# @sections: The EPC sections info for guest
> > > +# @section-size: The EPC section size for guest (Will be deprecated in 7.2)
> >
> > I expected deprecation would start now (7.0, and it would be removed
> > in 7.2.
> >
> > Also needs to be documented in docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >
> >
>
> Thanks Daniel, Please check if below comments are okay or not? If no
> problem, I will send v3 today, thanks!
>
> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> index e21e07478f..810542427f 100644
> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> @@ -441,3 +441,13 @@ nanoMIPS ISA
>
> The ``nanoMIPS`` ISA has never been upstreamed to any compiler toolchain.
> As it is hard to generate binaries for it, declare it deprecated.
> +
> +
> +SGX backwards compatibility
> +---------------------------
> +
> +@section-size (Since 7.0)
> +''''''''''''''''''''''''
> +
> +The ``@section-size`` will be replaced with ``@sections`` struct and declare
> +it deprecated.
This needs to be higher up in the file - look at the section
with the heading 'QEMU Machine Protocol (QMP) commands' for
how we list QMP features we're removing.
> diff --git a/qapi/misc-target.json b/qapi/misc-target.json
> index a87358ea44..c88fd0c2a2 100644
> --- a/qapi/misc-target.json
> +++ b/qapi/misc-target.json
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@
> #
> # @flc: true if FLC is supported
> #
> -# @section-size: The EPC section size for guest (Will be deprecated in 7.2)
> +# @section-size: The EPC section size for guest (7.0, and it would be removed in 7.2)
We don't need this comment - see the other reply in this thread
about using an '@deprecated' tag instead, which gets turned into
a comment in the auto-generated documentation.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-20 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-19 23:57 [PATCH v2] qapi: Cleanup SGX related comments and restore @section-size Yang Zhong
2022-01-20 0:24 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
2022-01-20 9:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-01-20 9:16 ` Yang Zhong
2022-01-20 9:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-01-20 13:17 ` Yang Zhong
2022-01-20 15:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
2022-01-20 15:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-01-20 15:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YekvAuBUzcfSaHiT@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).