From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-fs@redhat.com, mszeredi@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] virtiofsd: Parse extended "struct fuse_init_in"
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:21:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfLixIxlxw5uABJY@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfLberQgn4DV4MYS@work-vm>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 05:50:50PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Vivek Goyal (vgoyal@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Add some code to parse extended "struct fuse_init_in". And use a local
> > variable "flag" to represent 64 bit flags. This will make it easier
> > to add more features without having to worry about two 32bit flags (->flags
> > and ->flags2) in "fuse_struct_in".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> > index ce29a70253..c3af5ede08 100644
> > --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> > +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> > @@ -1886,6 +1886,7 @@ static void do_init(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t nodeid,
> > struct fuse_session *se = req->se;
> > size_t bufsize = se->bufsize;
> > size_t outargsize = sizeof(outarg);
> > + uint64_t flags = 0;
> >
> > (void)nodeid;
> >
> > @@ -1902,11 +1903,21 @@ static void do_init(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t nodeid,
> > fuse_reply_err(req, EINVAL);
> > return;
> > }
> > + flags |= arg->flags;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* fuse_init_in was extended again with minor version 36 */
> > + if (sizeof(*arg) > compat2_size && (arg->flags & FUSE_INIT_EXT)) {
> > + if (!fuse_mbuf_iter_advance(iter, sizeof(*arg) - compat2_size)) {
> > + fuse_reply_err(req, EINVAL);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> Instead of reading upto sizeof(*arg) should we actually read up to the
> size of the last field we know about? That way if fuse_init_in grows
> again this wont break?
I think that makes sense. Can probably call it init_size_v7_36, which
represents size of fuse_init till protocol version 7.36 extension.
Will update the patch.
Vivek
>
> (Other than that OK)
>
> > + flags |= (uint64_t) arg->flags2 << 32;
> > }
> >
> > fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "INIT: %u.%u\n", arg->major, arg->minor);
> > if (arg->major == 7 && arg->minor >= 6) {
> > - fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "flags=0x%08x\n", arg->flags);
> > + fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "flags=0x%016llx\n", flags);
> > fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "max_readahead=0x%08x\n", arg->max_readahead);
> > }
> > se->conn.proto_major = arg->major;
> > @@ -1934,68 +1945,68 @@ static void do_init(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t nodeid,
> > if (arg->max_readahead < se->conn.max_readahead) {
> > se->conn.max_readahead = arg->max_readahead;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_ASYNC_READ) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_ASYNC_READ) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_ASYNC_READ;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_POSIX_LOCKS) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_POSIX_LOCKS) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_POSIX_LOCKS;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_ATOMIC_O_TRUNC) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_ATOMIC_O_TRUNC) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_ATOMIC_O_TRUNC;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_EXPORT_SUPPORT) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_EXPORT_SUPPORT) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_EXPORT_SUPPORT;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_DONT_MASK) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_DONT_MASK) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_DONT_MASK;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_FLOCK_LOCKS) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_FLOCK_LOCKS) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_FLOCK_LOCKS;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_AUTO_INVAL_DATA) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_AUTO_INVAL_DATA) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_AUTO_INVAL_DATA;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_DO_READDIRPLUS) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_DO_READDIRPLUS) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_READDIRPLUS;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_READDIRPLUS_AUTO) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_READDIRPLUS_AUTO) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_READDIRPLUS_AUTO;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_ASYNC_DIO) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_ASYNC_DIO) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_ASYNC_DIO;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_WRITEBACK_CACHE) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_WRITEBACK_CACHE) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_WRITEBACK_CACHE;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_NO_OPEN_SUPPORT) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_NO_OPEN_SUPPORT) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_NO_OPEN_SUPPORT;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_PARALLEL_DIROPS) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_PARALLEL_DIROPS) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_PARALLEL_DIROPS;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_POSIX_ACL) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_POSIX_ACL) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_POSIX_ACL;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_HANDLE_KILLPRIV;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_NO_OPENDIR_SUPPORT) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_NO_OPENDIR_SUPPORT) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_NO_OPENDIR_SUPPORT;
> > }
> > - if (!(arg->flags & FUSE_MAX_PAGES)) {
> > + if (!(flags & FUSE_MAX_PAGES)) {
> > size_t max_bufsize = FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ * getpagesize() +
> > FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE;
> > if (bufsize > max_bufsize) {
> > bufsize = max_bufsize;
> > }
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_SUBMOUNTS) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_SUBMOUNTS) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_SUBMOUNTS;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_SETXATTR_EXT) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_SETXATTR_EXT) {
> > se->conn.capable |= FUSE_CAP_SETXATTR_EXT;
> > }
> > #ifdef HAVE_SPLICE
> > @@ -2063,7 +2074,7 @@ static void do_init(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t nodeid,
> > if (se->conn.max_write < bufsize - FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE) {
> > se->bufsize = se->conn.max_write + FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE;
> > }
> > - if (arg->flags & FUSE_MAX_PAGES) {
> > + if (flags & FUSE_MAX_PAGES) {
> > outarg.flags |= FUSE_MAX_PAGES;
> > outarg.max_pages = (se->conn.max_write - 1) / getpagesize() + 1;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
> --
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-24 21:24 [PATCH v4 0/9] virtiofsd: Add support for file security context at creation Vivek Goyal
2022-01-24 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] linux-headers: Update headers to v5.17-rc1 Vivek Goyal
2022-01-27 17:21 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-27 18:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2022-01-27 19:42 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-24 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] virtiofsd: Fix breakage due to fuse_init_in size change Vivek Goyal
2022-01-27 17:17 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-24 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] virtiofsd: Parse extended "struct fuse_init_in" Vivek Goyal
2022-01-27 17:50 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-27 18:21 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2022-01-24 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] virtiofsd: Extend size of fuse_conn_info->capable and ->want fields Vivek Goyal
2022-01-27 17:53 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-27 18:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2022-01-24 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] virtiofsd, fuse_lowlevel.c: Add capability to parse security context Vivek Goyal
2022-01-24 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] virtiofsd: Move core file creation code in separate function Vivek Goyal
2022-01-27 19:50 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-24 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] virtiofsd: Create new file with fscreate set Vivek Goyal
2022-01-24 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] virtiofsd: Create new file using O_TMPFILE and set security context Vivek Goyal
2022-01-24 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] virtiofsd: Add an option to enable/disable security label Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfLixIxlxw5uABJY@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).