From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B1CC433F5 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56016 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEXpl-0000Kc-39 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:39:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEXim-000067-Li for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:31:57 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:39757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEXih-00048S-Dy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:31:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643639510; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=Jr26QzYzFr9QOqsAxKm4BckmDyVpDHixTtWZXECycf8=; b=OSjJJur/ov0RdasQfWhrCBweGunYnBWujKXzqfsShmq31jGdZxmBEckYYWLOpB/55TzG+x 2ULkDdNUIWA6HWGylQOQ3YPkML4oj0ndpz5XVnAOaRtfSZD8KL5iRiEHWwnyTloNhYdeKt Ozj+jzpAL9pxF0NXpQ7aB0dPpqRtXU0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-255-dtt5Vg8bNiWntwknV2jodg-1; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:31:48 -0500 X-MC-Unique: dtt5Vg8bNiWntwknV2jodg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2C441083F60 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.39.195.62]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B5C10A403F; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:31:26 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: otubo@redhat.com Subject: Re: Stepping down from seccomp mintainership Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.5 (2021-12-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.088, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 01:54:02PM +0100, Eduardo Otubo wrote: > Hello all, > > It's been a while since my last commit or pull request, and given the > current state of things I don't think I'll be coming back to actual > QEMU development. At least not as frequently as I wanted to have > seccomp under my eyes at all times. > > This being said, I'd like to retire as the seccomp maintainer. Anyone > who wishes to take over from here is welcome to do so. I've been responsible for a number of the seccomp patches, and the overall change in design approach from deny-all-with-exceptions to allow-all-with-exceptions. I don't especially want to take on more work, but this feature doesn't see frequent changes, so I'd be ok to pick this up in an 'odd fixes' role, unless some other maintainer has a burning desire to invest more time. I can send a MAINTAINERS file update swapping our names, in a few days unless some else jumps in to volunteer in the meantime.... Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|