From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Leonardo Bras Soares Passos <lsoaresp@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 07/15] migration: Introduce postcopy channels on dest node
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 15:08:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yfvv9zYcgJWg+Yy9@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220119080929.39485-8-peterx@redhat.com>
* Peter Xu (peterx@redhat.com) wrote:
> Postcopy handles huge pages in a special way that currently we can only have
> one "channel" to transfer the page.
>
> It's because when we install pages using UFFDIO_COPY, we need to have the whole
> huge page ready, it also means we need to have a temp huge page when trying to
> receive the whole content of the page.
>
> Currently all maintainance around this tmp page is global: firstly we'll
> allocate a temp huge page, then we maintain its status mostly within
> ram_load_postcopy().
>
> To enable multiple channels for postcopy, the first thing we need to do is to
> prepare N temp huge pages as caching, one for each channel.
>
> Meanwhile we need to maintain the tmp huge page status per-channel too.
>
> To give some example, some local variables maintained in ram_load_postcopy()
> are listed; they are responsible for maintaining temp huge page status:
>
> - all_zero: this keeps whether this huge page contains all zeros
> - target_pages: this counts how many target pages have been copied
> - host_page: this keeps the host ptr for the page to install
>
> Move all these fields to be together with the temp huge pages to form a new
> structure called PostcopyTmpPage. Then for each (future) postcopy channel, we
> need one structure to keep the state around.
>
> For vanilla postcopy, obviously there's only one channel. It contains both
> precopy and postcopy pages.
>
> This patch teaches the dest migration node to start realize the possible number
> of postcopy channels by introducing the "postcopy_channels" variable. Its
> value is calculated when setup postcopy on dest node (during POSTCOPY_LISTEN
> phase).
>
> Vanilla postcopy will have channels=1, but when postcopy-preempt capability is
> enabled (in the future), we will boost it to 2 because even during partial
> sending of a precopy huge page we still want to preempt it and start sending
> the postcopy requested page right away (so we start to keep two temp huge
> pages; more if we want to enable multifd). In this patch there's a TODO marked
> for that; so far the channels is always set to 1.
>
> We need to send one "host huge page" on one channel only and we cannot split
> them, because otherwise the data upon the same huge page can locate on more
> than one channel so we need more complicated logic to manage. One temp host
> huge page for each channel will be enough for us for now.
>
> Postcopy will still always use the index=0 huge page even after this patch.
> However it prepares for the latter patches where it can start to use multiple
> channels (which needs src intervention, because only src knows which channel we
> should use).
Generally OK, some minor nits.
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
> migration/migration.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> migration/postcopy-ram.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> migration/ram.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/migration.h b/migration/migration.h
> index 8130b703eb..8bb2931312 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.h
> +++ b/migration/migration.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,24 @@ struct PostcopyBlocktimeContext;
> */
> #define CLEAR_BITMAP_SHIFT_MAX 31
>
> +/* This is an abstraction of a "temp huge page" for postcopy's purpose */
> +typedef struct {
> + /*
> + * This points to a temporary huge page as a buffer for UFFDIO_COPY. It's
> + * mmap()ed and needs to be freed when cleanup.
> + */
> + void *tmp_huge_page;
> + /*
> + * This points to the host page we're going to install for this temp page.
> + * It tells us after we've received the whole page, where we should put it.
> + */
> + void *host_addr;
> + /* Number of small pages copied (in size of TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) */
> + int target_pages;
Can we take the opportunity to convert this to an unsigned?
> + /* Whether this page contains all zeros */
> + bool all_zero;
> +} PostcopyTmpPage;
> +
> /* State for the incoming migration */
> struct MigrationIncomingState {
> QEMUFile *from_src_file;
> @@ -81,7 +99,22 @@ struct MigrationIncomingState {
> QemuMutex rp_mutex; /* We send replies from multiple threads */
> /* RAMBlock of last request sent to source */
> RAMBlock *last_rb;
> - void *postcopy_tmp_page;
> + /*
> + * Number of postcopy channels including the default precopy channel, so
> + * vanilla postcopy will only contain one channel which contain both
> + * precopy and postcopy streams.
> + *
> + * This is calculated when the src requests to enable postcopy but before
> + * it starts. Its value can depend on e.g. whether postcopy preemption is
> + * enabled.
> + */
> + int postcopy_channels;
Also unsigned?
> + /*
> + * An array of temp host huge pages to be used, one for each postcopy
> + * channel.
> + */
> + PostcopyTmpPage *postcopy_tmp_pages;
> + /* This is shared for all postcopy channels */
> void *postcopy_tmp_zero_page;
> /* PostCopyFD's for external userfaultfds & handlers of shared memory */
> GArray *postcopy_remote_fds;
> diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> index e662dd05cc..d78e1b9373 100644
> --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> @@ -525,9 +525,18 @@ int postcopy_ram_incoming_init(MigrationIncomingState *mis)
>
> static void postcopy_temp_pages_cleanup(MigrationIncomingState *mis)
> {
> - if (mis->postcopy_tmp_page) {
> - munmap(mis->postcopy_tmp_page, mis->largest_page_size);
> - mis->postcopy_tmp_page = NULL;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (mis->postcopy_tmp_pages) {
> + for (i = 0; i < mis->postcopy_channels; i++) {
> + if (mis->postcopy_tmp_pages[i].tmp_huge_page) {
> + munmap(mis->postcopy_tmp_pages[i].tmp_huge_page,
> + mis->largest_page_size);
> + mis->postcopy_tmp_pages[i].tmp_huge_page = NULL;
> + }
> + }
> + g_free(mis->postcopy_tmp_pages);
> + mis->postcopy_tmp_pages = NULL;
> }
>
> if (mis->postcopy_tmp_zero_page) {
> @@ -1091,17 +1100,30 @@ retry:
>
> static int postcopy_temp_pages_setup(MigrationIncomingState *mis)
> {
> - int err;
> -
> - mis->postcopy_tmp_page = mmap(NULL, mis->largest_page_size,
> - PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> - MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> - if (mis->postcopy_tmp_page == MAP_FAILED) {
> - err = errno;
> - mis->postcopy_tmp_page = NULL;
> - error_report("%s: Failed to map postcopy_tmp_page %s",
> - __func__, strerror(err));
> - return -err;
> + PostcopyTmpPage *tmp_page;
> + int err, i, channels;
> + void *temp_page;
> +
> + /* TODO: will be boosted when enable postcopy preemption */
> + mis->postcopy_channels = 1;
> +
> + channels = mis->postcopy_channels;
> + mis->postcopy_tmp_pages = g_malloc0(sizeof(PostcopyTmpPage) * channels);
I noticed we've started using g_malloc0_n in a few places
> + for (i = 0; i < channels; i++) {
> + tmp_page = &mis->postcopy_tmp_pages[i];
> + temp_page = mmap(NULL, mis->largest_page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> + if (temp_page == MAP_FAILED) {
> + err = errno;
> + error_report("%s: Failed to map postcopy_tmp_pages[%d]: %s",
> + __func__, i, strerror(err));
Please call postcopy_temp_pages_cleanup here to cleanup previous pages
that were succesfully allocated.
> + return -err;
> + }
> + tmp_page->tmp_huge_page = temp_page;
> + /* Initialize default states for each tmp page */
> + tmp_page->all_zero = true;
> + tmp_page->target_pages = 0;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 0df15ff663..930e722e39 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -3639,11 +3639,8 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
> bool place_needed = false;
> bool matches_target_page_size = false;
> MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
> - /* Temporary page that is later 'placed' */
> - void *postcopy_host_page = mis->postcopy_tmp_page;
> - void *host_page = NULL;
> - bool all_zero = true;
> - int target_pages = 0;
> + /* Currently we only use channel 0. TODO: use all the channels */
> + PostcopyTmpPage *tmp_page = &mis->postcopy_tmp_pages[0];
>
> while (!ret && !(flags & RAM_SAVE_FLAG_EOS)) {
> ram_addr_t addr;
> @@ -3687,7 +3684,7 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
> ret = -EINVAL;
> break;
> }
> - target_pages++;
> + tmp_page->target_pages++;
> matches_target_page_size = block->page_size == TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
> /*
> * Postcopy requires that we place whole host pages atomically;
> @@ -3699,15 +3696,16 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
> * however the source ensures it always sends all the components
> * of a host page in one chunk.
> */
> - page_buffer = postcopy_host_page +
> + page_buffer = tmp_page->tmp_huge_page +
> host_page_offset_from_ram_block_offset(block, addr);
> /* If all TP are zero then we can optimise the place */
> - if (target_pages == 1) {
> - host_page = host_page_from_ram_block_offset(block, addr);
> - } else if (host_page != host_page_from_ram_block_offset(block,
> - addr)) {
> + if (tmp_page->target_pages == 1) {
> + tmp_page->host_addr =
> + host_page_from_ram_block_offset(block, addr);
> + } else if (tmp_page->host_addr !=
> + host_page_from_ram_block_offset(block, addr)) {
> /* not the 1st TP within the HP */
> - error_report("Non-same host page %p/%p", host_page,
> + error_report("Non-same host page %p/%p", tmp_page->host_addr,
> host_page_from_ram_block_offset(block, addr));
> ret = -EINVAL;
> break;
> @@ -3717,10 +3715,11 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
> * If it's the last part of a host page then we place the host
> * page
> */
> - if (target_pages == (block->page_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + if (tmp_page->target_pages ==
> + (block->page_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
> place_needed = true;
> }
> - place_source = postcopy_host_page;
> + place_source = tmp_page->tmp_huge_page;
> }
>
> switch (flags & ~RAM_SAVE_FLAG_CONTINUE) {
> @@ -3734,12 +3733,12 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
> memset(page_buffer, ch, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
> }
> if (ch) {
> - all_zero = false;
> + tmp_page->all_zero = false;
> }
> break;
>
> case RAM_SAVE_FLAG_PAGE:
> - all_zero = false;
> + tmp_page->all_zero = false;
> if (!matches_target_page_size) {
> /* For huge pages, we always use temporary buffer */
> qemu_get_buffer(f, page_buffer, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -3757,7 +3756,7 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
> }
> break;
> case RAM_SAVE_FLAG_COMPRESS_PAGE:
> - all_zero = false;
> + tmp_page->all_zero = false;
> len = qemu_get_be32(f);
> if (len < 0 || len > compressBound(TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
> error_report("Invalid compressed data length: %d", len);
> @@ -3789,16 +3788,16 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
> }
>
> if (!ret && place_needed) {
> - if (all_zero) {
> - ret = postcopy_place_page_zero(mis, host_page, block);
> + if (tmp_page->all_zero) {
> + ret = postcopy_place_page_zero(mis, tmp_page->host_addr, block);
> } else {
> - ret = postcopy_place_page(mis, host_page, place_source,
> + ret = postcopy_place_page(mis, tmp_page->host_addr, place_source,
> block);
> }
> place_needed = false;
> - target_pages = 0;
> + tmp_page->target_pages = 0;
> /* Assume we have a zero page until we detect something different */
> - all_zero = true;
> + tmp_page->all_zero = true;
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.32.0
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-19 8:09 [PATCH RFC 00/15] migration: Postcopy Preemption Peter Xu
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 01/15] migration: No off-by-one for pss->page update in host page size Peter Xu
2022-01-19 12:58 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-27 9:40 ` Juan Quintela
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 02/15] migration: Allow pss->page jump over clean pages Peter Xu
2022-01-19 13:42 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-20 2:12 ` Peter Xu
2022-02-03 18:19 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-08 3:20 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 03/15] migration: Enable UFFD_FEATURE_THREAD_ID even without blocktime feat Peter Xu
2022-01-19 14:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-27 9:40 ` Juan Quintela
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 04/15] migration: Add postcopy_has_request() Peter Xu
2022-01-19 14:27 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-27 9:41 ` Juan Quintela
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 05/15] migration: Simplify unqueue_page() Peter Xu
2022-01-19 16:36 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-20 2:23 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-25 11:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-27 9:41 ` Juan Quintela
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 06/15] migration: Move temp page setup and cleanup into separate functions Peter Xu
2022-01-19 16:58 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-27 9:43 ` Juan Quintela
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 07/15] migration: Introduce postcopy channels on dest node Peter Xu
2022-02-03 15:08 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2022-02-08 3:27 ` Peter Xu
2022-02-08 9:43 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-08 10:07 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 08/15] migration: Dump ramblock and offset too when non-same-page detected Peter Xu
2022-02-03 15:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 09/15] migration: Add postcopy_thread_create() Peter Xu
2022-02-03 15:19 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-08 3:37 ` Peter Xu
2022-02-08 11:16 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 10/15] migration: Move static var in ram_block_from_stream() into global Peter Xu
2022-02-03 17:48 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-08 3:51 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 11/15] migration: Add pss.postcopy_requested status Peter Xu
2022-02-03 15:42 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 12/15] migration: Move migrate_allow_multifd and helpers into migration.c Peter Xu
2022-02-03 15:44 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 13/15] migration: Add postcopy-preempt capability Peter Xu
2022-02-03 15:46 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 14/15] migration: Postcopy preemption on separate channel Peter Xu
2022-02-03 17:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-08 4:22 ` Peter Xu
2022-02-08 11:24 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-08 11:39 ` Peter Xu
2022-02-08 13:23 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-02-09 2:16 ` Peter Xu
2022-01-19 8:09 ` [PATCH RFC 15/15] tests: Add postcopy preempt test Peter Xu
2022-02-03 15:53 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-01-19 12:32 ` [PATCH RFC 00/15] migration: Postcopy Preemption Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yfvv9zYcgJWg+Yy9@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=lsoaresp@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).