From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D82A8C433EF for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40998 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nOidn-0005pO-QD for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:12:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nOiZY-0006yM-2I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:08:28 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:59784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nOiZS-0003hz-4N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:08:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1646064499; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=7vxn8tbOS2f7CD5I4aSiP90cKsMLgRBMB+DV2TX5ua4=; b=Y3Q3FaVV8Pvanppgmd+UsRpjZgWC4WXFTsUrLY2q7Ge9bPLRLba19zi1inHRMPNMVWyNIs 8n4jUOdQBLxkNAOJ0LDu678n3LuecO4UfCrZ+W/6iIu9cTOXF/3O4lz+w5LyH6oGm4MCcO ypKcgpFwTosPtJQbpaxp3vne7jVcKk8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-659-hQ7LENk3PW62OqS43-sZqw-1; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:08:11 -0500 X-MC-Unique: hQ7LENk3PW62OqS43-sZqw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4110E180FD73; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.33.36.149]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70C710589D4; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:08:05 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Simeon Schaub Subject: Re: [PATCH] explicitly link libqemuutil against rt Message-ID: References: <949b0675-cbae-51dc-5a3b-d0215738279b@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <949b0675-cbae-51dc-5a3b-d0215738279b@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.5 (2021-12-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:13:15AM -0500, Simeon Schaub wrote: > We generally target glibc 2.12 in the Julia ecosystem, since CentOS 6 is > still quite common in the HPC community. Oh wow, we dropped RHEL/CentOS 6 support a very long time ago for QEMU, and also dropped RHEL-7 last year. FWIW, our platform target policy is set out here: https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/about/build-platforms.html Currently RHEL-8 is the oldest RHEL we support since RHEL-7 also dropped out under the rule "Support for the previous major version will be dropped 2 years after the new major version is released" I'm surprised you didn't have to patch lots of other aspects of QEMU, since a system targetting glibc 2.12 would be likely to have a GCC version that we explicitly block use of at build time, as well as other outdated 3rd party libraries we check min versions of in configure. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|