From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A342C433F5 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 19:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59084 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTpz6-0007mp-93 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:04:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTpxn-0006O5-Fg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:02:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:28506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTpxl-0004g9-Um for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:02:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1647284556; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=05QEhzcNZBs0qVmJtujjBWsIq9B7j8vdOOjg+9QbHX0=; b=SG7s60/7EtAHt4uAXHQnAiBBLwS/zcizrS5IUEJ+Zxmj5Vw6eeE0Ui9zyAplCZCLqxeauf rTpp/HAhp2jOSzq8NZD4D+RXPASvMvetsJQ8A5ngD+880AOJXVdEgN7EeKDMIsViGQrBaJ oNT9J0OQ2fij583c7g/iqVrMUnj3rvE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-82-XNoz7wUpNb-iI6s9OiUyeA-1; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:02:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XNoz7wUpNb-iI6s9OiUyeA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DEA5380390E; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 19:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.33.36.154]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ABE37BA720; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 19:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 19:02:28 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ppc: Include asm/ptrace.h for pt_regs struct definition Message-ID: References: <20220314172508.816110-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.5 (2021-12-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.9 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza , Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Khem Raj Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 06:06:40PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 17:59, Daniel Henrique Barboza > wrote: > > I am intrigued about why we didn't hit this before, especially considering that ppc64 header is just a > > pointer to this file. > > It's specific to musl, which does different things with its > system includes than glibc does. And while we have CI testing for QEMU with Alpine that uses musl, this is only x86_64 host. IOW we don't have CI coverage of ppc64 host with musl, only glibc Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|