From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i386: Add notify VM exit support
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:17:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YinCH/GbShwG1fRF@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310090205.10645-3-chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 05:02:05PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> There are cases that malicious virtual machine can cause CPU stuck (due
> to event windows don't open up), e.g., infinite loop in microcode when
> nested #AC (CVE-2015-5307). No event window means no event (NMI, SMI and
> IRQ) can be delivered. It leads the CPU to be unavailable to host or
> other VMs. Notify VM exit is introduced to mitigate such kind of
> attacks, which will generate a VM exit if no event window occurs in VM
> non-root mode for a specified amount of time (notify window).
>
> A new KVM capability KVM_CAP_X86_NOTIFY_VMEXIT is exposed to user space
> so that the user can query the capability and set the expected notify
> window when creating VMs.
>
> If notify VM exit happens with VM_INVALID_CONTEXT, hypervisor should
> exit to user space with the exit reason KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY to inform the
> fatal case. Then user space can inject a SHUTDOWN event to the target
> vcpu. This is implemented by defining a new bit in flags field of
> kvm_vcpu_event in KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS ioctl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/x86.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/i386/x86.h | 3 +++
> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
> index b84840a1bb..25e6c50b1e 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/x86.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
> @@ -1309,6 +1309,23 @@ static void machine_set_sgx_epc(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
> qapi_free_SgxEPCList(list);
> }
>
> +static void x86_machine_get_notify_window(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> + const char *name, void *opaque, Error **errp)
> +{
> + X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(obj);
> + int32_t notify_window = x86ms->notify_window;
> +
> + visit_type_int32(v, name, ¬ify_window, errp);
> +}
> +
> +static void x86_machine_set_notify_window(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> + const char *name, void *opaque, Error **errp)
> +{
> + X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(obj);
> +
> + visit_type_int32(v, name, &x86ms->notify_window, errp);
> +}
> +
> static void x86_machine_initfn(Object *obj)
> {
> X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(obj);
> @@ -1319,6 +1336,7 @@ static void x86_machine_initfn(Object *obj)
> x86ms->oem_id = g_strndup(ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6, 6);
> x86ms->oem_table_id = g_strndup(ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME8, 8);
> x86ms->bus_lock_ratelimit = 0;
> + x86ms->notify_window = -1;
> }
IIUC from the kernel patch, this negative value leaves the protection
disabled, and thus the host remains vulnerable to the CVE. I would
expect this ought to set a suitable default value to fix the flaw.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 9:02 [PATCH 0/2] Enable notify VM exit Chenyi Qiang
2022-03-10 9:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] linux-headers: Sync the linux headers Chenyi Qiang
2022-03-10 9:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] i386: Add notify VM exit support Chenyi Qiang
2022-03-10 9:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-03-10 9:53 ` Chenyi Qiang
2022-03-10 10:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YinCH/GbShwG1fRF@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).