From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: Question about vmstate_register(), dc->vmsd and instance_id
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:29:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjNh2jSDpWvLJ1S3@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8eZ0G=ZxyCv7xCk-ZE7R_t6BnDtbGCsYgSBuLwyHprsQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 at 14:03, Daniel Henrique Barboza
> <danielhb413@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've been looking into converting some vmstate_register() calls to use dc->vmsd,
> > using as a base the docs in docs/devel/migration.rst. This doc mentions that we
> > can either register the vmsd by using vmstate_register() or we can use dc->vmsd
> > for qdev-based devices.
> >
> > When trying to convert this vmstate() call for the qdev alternative (hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c,
> > drc_realize()) I found this:
> >
> > vmstate_register(VMSTATE_IF(drc), spapr_drc_index(drc), &vmstate_spapr_drc,
> > drc);
> >
> > spapr_drc_index() is an unique identifier for these DRC devices and it's being used
> > as instance_id. It is not clear to me how we can keep using this same instance_id when
> > using the dc->vmsd alternative. By looking a bit into migration files I understood
> > that if dc->vmsd is being used the instance_id is always autogenerated. Is that correct?
>
> Not entirely. It is the intended common setup, but because changing
> the ID value breaks migration compatibility there is a mechanism
> for saying "my device is special and needs to set the instance ID
> to something else" -- qdev_set_legacy_instance_id().
Yes, this is normally only an issue for 'system' or memory mapped
devices; for things hung off a bus that has it's own device naming,
then each instance of a device has it's own device due to the bus name
so instance_id's aren't used. Where you've got a few of the
same device with the same name, and no bus for them to be named by, then
the instance_id is used to uniquify them.
Dave
> > Given that this is a 13 year old comment from Anthony Liguori I wanted to confirm its
> > validity. Is there a long term goal of getting rid of instance_id? Can I ignore its
> > role when converting these calls to dc->vmsd?
>
> Only if you're prepared to break migration compatibility, I think.
>
> -- PMM
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 13:58 Question about vmstate_register(), dc->vmsd and instance_id Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-03-17 15:04 ` Peter Maydell
2022-03-17 16:29 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2022-03-18 3:43 ` David Gibson
2022-03-18 19:51 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-03-19 9:43 ` David Gibson
2022-03-23 21:39 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjNh2jSDpWvLJ1S3@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).