Re: [RFC PATCH v3 17/36] pflash_cfi01/tdx: Introduce ram_mode of pflash for TDVF

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 04:51:27PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 3/22/2022 5:27 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> ...
> > IMHO the AmdSev build for OVMF gets this right by entirely disabling
> > the split OVMF_CODE.fd vs OVMF_VARS.fd, and just having a single
> > OVMF.fd file that is exposed read-only to the guest.
> > 
> > This is further represented in $QEMU.git/docs/interop/firmware.json
> > by marking the firmware as 'stateless', which apps like libvirt will
> > use to figure out what QEMU command line to pick.
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I don't play with AMD SEV and I'm not sure if AMD SEV requires only single
> OVMF.fd. But IIUC, from edk2
> 
> commit 437eb3f7a8db ("OvmfPkg/QemuFlashFvbServicesRuntimeDxe: Bypass flash
> detection with SEV-ES")
> 
> , AMD SEV(-ES) does support NVRAM via proactive VMGEXIT MMIO
> QemuFlashWrite(). If so, AMD SEV seems to be able to support split OVMF,
> right?

Note that while the traditional OvmfPkg build can be used with
SEV/SEV-ES, this is not viable for measured boot, as it uses
the NVRAM whose content is not measured.

I was specifically referring to the OvmfPkg/AmdSev build which
doesn't use seprate NVRAM, and has no variables persistence.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|