From: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
To: Dmitry Tikhov <d.tihov@yadro.com>
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, ddtikhov@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, linux@yadro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/nvme: add new command abort case
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:13:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yl/csehng+W0gfQD@apples> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420082044.n6orslk2aukj2jai@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1945 bytes --]
On Apr 20 11:20, Dmitry Tikhov wrote:
> NVMe command set specification for end-to-end data protection formatted
> namespace states:
>
> o If the Reference Tag Check bit of the PRCHK field is set to ‘1’ and
> the namespace is formatted for Type 3 protection, then the
> controller:
> ▪ should not compare the protection Information Reference Tag
> field to the computed reference tag; and
> ▪ may ignore the ILBRT and EILBRT fields. If a command is
> aborted as a result of the Reference Tag Check bit of the
> PRCHK field being set to ‘1’, then that command should be
> aborted with a status code of Invalid Protection Information,
> but may be aborted with a status code of Invalid Field in
> Command.
>
> Currently qemu compares reftag in the nvme_dif_prchk function whenever
> Reference Tag Check bit is set in the command. For type 3 namespaces
> however, caller of nvme_dif_prchk - nvme_dif_check does not increment
> reftag for each subsequent logical block. That way commands incorporating
> more than one logical block for type 3 formatted namespaces with reftag
> check bit set, always fail with End-to-end Reference Tag Check Error.
> Comply with spec by handling case of set Reference Tag Check
> bit in the type 3 formatted namespace.
>
Note the "should" and "may" in your quote. What QEMU does right now is
compliant with v1.4. That is, the reftag must NOT be incremented
- it is the same for the first and all subsequent logical blocks.
I'm a bit hesitant to follow v2.0 here, since we do not report v2.0
compliance yet. I'm honestly also a bit perplexed as to how the NVMe TWG
ended up considering this backwards compatible. As far as I can tell
this breaks current hosts that do set the reference tag check bit,
provides a valid ILBRT/EILBRT and expects it to succeed.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-20 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 8:20 [PATCH] hw/nvme: add new command abort case Dmitry Tikhov
2022-04-20 10:13 ` Klaus Jensen [this message]
2022-04-20 10:36 ` Klaus Jensen
2022-04-20 10:41 ` Dmitry Tikhov
2022-04-20 10:54 ` Klaus Jensen
2022-04-20 12:31 ` Dmitry Tikhov
2022-04-20 12:48 ` Klaus Jensen
2022-05-31 11:13 ` Klaus Jensen
2022-05-31 11:31 ` Klaus Jensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yl/csehng+W0gfQD@apples \
--to=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=d.tihov@yadro.com \
--cc=ddtikhov@gmail.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@yadro.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).