qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] aio_wait_kick: add missing memory barrier
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 06:21:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmzHdG9a4F+ZjJg7@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8ac2a96-4508-9cc3-9ca8-762851997103@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1887 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:06:33AM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 28/04/2022 um 13:09 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:51:07AM -0400, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> >> It seems that aio_wait_kick always required a memory barrier
> >> or atomic operation in the caller, but almost nobody actually
> >> took care of doing it.
> >>
> >> Let's put the barrier in the function instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  util/aio-wait.c | 3 ++-
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/util/aio-wait.c b/util/aio-wait.c
> >> index bdb3d3af22..c0a343ac87 100644
> >> --- a/util/aio-wait.c
> >> +++ b/util/aio-wait.c
> >> @@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ static void dummy_bh_cb(void *opaque)
> >>  
> >>  void aio_wait_kick(void)
> >>  {
> >> -    /* The barrier (or an atomic op) is in the caller.  */
> >> +    smp_mb();
> > 
> > What is the purpose of the barrier and what does it pair with?
> > 
> > I guess we want to make sure that all stores before aio_wait_kick() are
> > visible to the other thread's AIO_WAIT_WHILE() cond expression. that
> > would require smp_wmb(). I'm not sure why it's a full smp_mb() barrier.
> 
> I think we need the full smp_mb barrier because we have a read
> afterwards (num_readers) and we want to ensure ordering also for that.
> 
> Regarding pairing, yes you are right. I need to also add a smp_mb()
> between the write(num_waiters) and read(condition) in AIO_WAIT_WHILE,
> otherwise it won't work properly.
> 
> So we basically have
> 
> Caller:
> 	write(condition)
> 	aio_wait_kick()
> 		smp_mb()
> 		read(num_writers)
> 
> AIO_WAIT_WHILE:
> 	write(num_writers)
> 	read(condition)

That makes sense to me, thank you! Please include the explanation in the
comments.

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-30  5:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-26  8:51 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Removal of AioContext lock, bs->parents and ->children: new rwlock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-26  8:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] aio_wait_kick: add missing memory barrier Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-28 11:09   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-29  8:06     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-30  5:21       ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2022-04-29  8:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-26  8:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] coroutine-lock: release lock when restarting all coroutines Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-26 14:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-28 11:21   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-28 22:14     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-29  9:35       ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-26  8:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] block: introduce a lock to protect graph operations Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-26 15:00   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-28 13:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-29  8:37     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-30  5:48       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-02  7:54         ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-05-03 10:50           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-26  8:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] async: register/unregister aiocontext in graph lock list Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-28 13:46   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-28 22:19     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-29  8:37       ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-26  8:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] block.c: wrlock in bdrv_replace_child_noperm Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-26 15:07   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-28 13:55   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-29  8:41     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-26  8:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] block: assert that graph read and writes are performed correctly Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-28 14:43   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-26  8:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] graph-lock: implement WITH_GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD and GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD macros Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-28 15:00   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-26  8:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] mirror: protect drains in coroutine with rdlock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-27  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Removal of AioContext lock, bs->parents and ->children: new rwlock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-28 10:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-28 21:56     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-04-30  5:17       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-02  8:02         ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-05-02 13:15           ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-03  8:24           ` Kevin Wolf
2022-05-03 11:04           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-28 10:34 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-29  8:06   ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-05-04 13:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-17 10:59   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-18 12:28     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-05-18 12:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-18 14:57         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-18 16:14         ` Kevin Wolf
2022-05-19 11:27           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-19 12:52             ` Kevin Wolf
2022-05-22 15:06           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-23  8:48             ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-05-23 13:15               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-23 13:54                 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-05-23 13:02             ` Kevin Wolf
2022-05-23 15:13               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-23 16:04                 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-05-23 16:45                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-24  7:55             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-24  8:08               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-24  9:17                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-24 10:20                   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-24 17:25                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-24 10:36         ` Kevin Wolf
2022-05-25  7:41           ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-18 14:27       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-24 12:10       ` Kevin Wolf
2022-05-25  8:27         ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YmzHdG9a4F+ZjJg7@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).