qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitlab: don't run CI jobs by default on push to user forks
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 10:13:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnosvmVvY8mT5Ijp@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89103e61-3ff0-c374-2317-585ebfb93e6f@redhat.com>

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:51:09AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 12/08/2021 20.04, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Currently pushes to user forks run the same set of build / test jobs as
> > pushes to the main repo. This results in creation of 120+ individual
> > jobs. While it is useful for subsystem maintainers, and even regular
> > contributors to be able to run the full set of jobs, it is wasteful to
> > run all of them all the time.
> 
>  Hi Daniel!
> 
> Now that gitlab introduces limits for the CI for all users, I think we
> should revisit this topic ... could you maybe respin your patch to the
> current git master branch?

Yes, I really do need to revisit this patch.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



      reply	other threads:[~2022-05-10  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-12 18:04 [PATCH 0/2] gitlab: prepare for limited CI minutes by not running by default Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-12 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] docs: split the CI docs into two files Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-16 11:02   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-08-24 16:29   ` Willian Rampazzo
2021-08-12 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] gitlab: don't run CI jobs by default on push to user forks Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-16 10:44   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-08-16 11:03     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-16 11:20       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-08-16 11:35         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-16 11:45           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-08-16 11:47       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-08-16 12:01         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-16 13:19           ` Cornelia Huck
2021-08-16 13:23             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-16 15:16           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-08-25 10:42   ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-15 14:45     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-05-10  8:51   ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-10  9:13     ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YnosvmVvY8mT5Ijp@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).