From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Henrique Barboza" <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Getting rid of the last bits of QEMU's 'ad-hoc CI' for merges
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:58:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoJ0jEH9eNbeTtz9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c93e737-538a-aacc-e893-3f9e2c0f4692@kaod.org>
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 5/16/22 15:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 14:51, Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 5/16/22 14:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > > I think we can get away with just dropping ppc64be -- we have
> > > > coverage for it as a cross-compile setup, and hopefully the
> > > > s390x CI runner will catch the various "fails tests on big-endian host"
> > > > issues. (Alternatively if anybody has a ppc64be machine they'd like
> > > > to let us run a gitlab CI runner on, we could do that :-))
> > >
> > > No recent HW (P8 and above) would run a PPC64 BE distro if LE is
> > > supported by HW.
> >
> > FWIW, the machine I use for ad-hoc CI is one in the gcc compile
> > farm, which is supposedly a "IBM POWER8 8284-22A", running Debian sid.
>
> Since the P8 have been around (~2014), the focus is really on LE.
> I think debian is the last distro still providing BE binaries.
> But no iso, you have to start with a debian 1O and do the upgrade.
If even Debian 11 has stopped providing ppc64be images, then
the end really is nigh. We still support Debian 10 as a target
in our platform support matrix until Debin 12 comes out in
mid/late 2023.
So IMHO we've got at most 1 year left of needing to worry
about ppc64be targets.
> > If BE PPC is fading away then that's another argument for
> > living with the loss of CI coverage, I guess.
>
> yes.
>
> It would good to keep a BE host for test coverage. It doesn't have
> to be ppc64be if it is too complex to maintain.
IIUC, we've got s390x giving BE coverage right now, at least
for certain configure option combinations.
> I can help on setting up a debian BE sid vm on the above IBM POWER8
> 8284-22A system if you need to. I have an image ready to use.
If we have a means to run CI for the next ~1 year great, but it
doesn't seem like worth investing masses of resources into it.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-16 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-16 12:43 Getting rid of the last bits of QEMU's 'ad-hoc CI' for merges Peter Maydell
2022-05-16 13:51 ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-05-16 13:55 ` Peter Maydell
2022-05-16 14:50 ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-05-16 15:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-05-16 14:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-16 14:30 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-16 14:35 ` Peter Maydell
2022-05-16 15:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoJ0jEH9eNbeTtz9@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=bleal@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).