From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, akihiko.odaki@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/vm: do not specify -bios option
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:29:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqsGDMENCErROHcT@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9bfd73ef-749b-e9d7-9202-5ba4221c0f72@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 12:14:01PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 6/16/22 10:44, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:30:25AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > When running from the build tree, the executable is able to find
> > > the BIOS on its own; when running from the source tree, a firmware
> > > blob should already be installed and there is no guarantee that
> > > the one in the source tree works with the QEMU that is being used for
> > > the installation.
> > I think there is interaction with
> >
> > --firmwarepath=/usr/share/qemu-firmware:/usr/share/ipxe/qemu:/usr/share/seavgabios:/usr/share/seabios:/usr/share/sgabios
> >
> > as the firmware path listed there will be searched before the local
> > build tree.
> >
> > I agree with your desire to remove the -bios option, but I'm not
> > sure it is entirely safe unless logic in qemu_find_file is fixed
> > to ignore the global search path when running from the build
> > tree.
>
> Isn't this the same for any other invocation of QEMU, for example in qtest?
Yes, quite likely in fact, so a pre-existing widespread problem and
thus not a reason to avoid this proposed change.
> I admit I didn't think of the interaction with --firmwarepath, but "if it
> hurts, don't do it" might apply here. That is, install compatible firmware
> to the path _before_ trying to use a QEMU that specifies that path.
I'm mostly thinking of downstream distro developers where they have an
installed QEMU but are working on a build from a different QEMU version.
We can address this separately though
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-16 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-16 8:30 [PATCH] tests/vm: do not specify -bios option Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-16 8:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-06-16 10:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-16 10:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-06-16 10:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-06-17 8:51 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqsGDMENCErROHcT@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=akihiko.odaki@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).