From: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] hw/nvme: add support for TP4084
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:08:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqtVhPyFylccLmed@apples> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yqs2x7Y/EjKGGCTg@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3558 bytes --]
On Jun 16 07:57, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 12:42:49PM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > On Jun 8 03:28, Niklas Cassel via wrote:
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > > considering that Linux v5.19-rc1 is out which includes support for
> > > NVMe TP4084:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/nvme/host/core.c?id=354201c53e61e493017b15327294b0c8ab522d69
> > >
> > > I thought that it might be nice to have QEMU support for the same.
> > >
> > > TP4084 adds a new mode, CC.CRIME, that can be used to mark a namespace
> > > as ready independently from the controller.
> > >
> > > When CC.CRIME is 0 (default), things behave as before, all namespaces
> > > are ready when CSTS.RDY gets set to 1.
> > >
> > > Add a new "ready_delay" namespace device parameter, in order to emulate
> > > different ready latencies for namespaces when CC.CRIME is 1.
> > >
> > > The patch series also adds a "crwmt" controller parameter, in order to
> > > be able to expose the worst case timeout that the host should wait for
> > > all namespaces to become ready.
> > >
> > >
> > > Example qemu cmd line for the new options:
> > >
> > > # delay in s (20s)
> > > NS1_DELAY_S=20
> > > # convert to units of 500ms
> > > NS1_DELAY=$((NS1_DELAY_S*2))
> > >
> > > # delay in s (60s)
> > > NS2_DELAY_S=60
> > > # convert to units of 500ms
> > > NS2_DELAY=$((NS2_DELAY_S*2))
> > >
> > > # timeout in s (120s)
> > > CRWMT_S=120
> > > # convert to units of 500ms
> > > CRWMT=$((CRWMT_S*2))
> > >
> > > -device nvme,serial=deadbeef,crwmt=$CRWMT \
> > > -drive file=$NS1_DATA,id=nvm-1,format=raw,if=none \
> > > -device nvme-ns,drive=nvm-1,ready_delay=$NS1_DELAY \
> > > -drive file=$NS2_DATA,id=nvm-2,format=raw,if=none \
> > > -device nvme-ns,drive=nvm-2,ready_delay=$NS2_DELAY \
> > >
> > >
> > > Niklas Cassel (4):
> > > hw/nvme: claim NVMe 2.0 compliance
> > > hw/nvme: store a pointer to the NvmeSubsystem in the NvmeNamespace
> > > hw/nvme: add support for ratified TP4084
> > > hw/nvme: add new never_ready parameter to test the DNR bit
> > >
> > > hw/nvme/ctrl.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > hw/nvme/ns.c | 17 +++++
> > > hw/nvme/nvme.h | 9 +++
> > > hw/nvme/trace-events | 1 +
> > > include/block/nvme.h | 60 ++++++++++++++++-
> > > 5 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.36.1
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Hi Niklas,
> >
> > I've been going back and forth on my position on this.
> >
> > I'm not straight up against it, but this only seems useful as a one-off
> > patch to test the kernel support for this. Considering the limitations
> > you state and the limited use case, I fear this is a little bloaty to
> > carry upstream.
> >
> > But I totally acknowledge that this is a horrible complicated behavior
> > to implement on the driver side, so I guess we might all benefit from
> > this.
> >
> > Keith, do you have an opinion on this?
>
> There are drivers utilizing the capability, so I think supporting it is fine
> despite this environment not having any inherent time-to-ready delays.
>
> This will probably be another knob that gets lots of use for initial driver
> validation, then largely forgotten. But maybe it will be useful for driver unit
> and regression testing in the future.
Alright, sounds good. I'll give it a proper review :)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-16 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-08 1:28 [PATCH 0/4] hw/nvme: add support for TP4084 Niklas Cassel via
2022-06-08 1:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] hw/nvme: claim NVMe 2.0 compliance Niklas Cassel via
2022-06-08 1:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] hw/nvme: store a pointer to the NvmeSubsystem in the NvmeNamespace Niklas Cassel via
2022-06-08 1:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] hw/nvme: add support for ratified TP4084 Niklas Cassel via
2022-06-08 1:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] hw/nvme: add new never_ready parameter to test the DNR bit Niklas Cassel via
2022-06-16 10:42 ` [PATCH 0/4] hw/nvme: add support for TP4084 Klaus Jensen
2022-06-16 13:57 ` Keith Busch
2022-06-16 16:08 ` Klaus Jensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqtVhPyFylccLmed@apples \
--to=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).