From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Hogan Wang <hogan.wang@huawei.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com,
wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dump: introduce dump-cancel QMP command
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:40:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ytk7Sg2s5J0AgsxA@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtkKwf7K6oev/3CP@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 09:13:53AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 02:21:18PM +0800, Hogan Wang via wrote:
> > There's no way to cancel the current executing dump process, lead to the
> > virtual machine manager daemon((e.g. libvirtd) cannot restore the dump
> > job after daemon restart.
> >
> > Add the 'cancelling' and 'cancelled' dump states.
> >
> > Use 'dump-cancel' qmp command Set the dump state as 'cancelling'.
> > The dump process check the 'cancelling' state and break loops.
> > The 'cancelled' state mark the dump process cancelled success.
>
> On the one hand this patch is fairly simple which is obviously
> desirable.
>
> On the other hand though, this feels like it is further re-inventing
> the jobs concept.
>
> IMHO ideally the 'dump' command probably ought to get a 'job-id'
I meant to say an *optional* job-id field, since we need to keep
back compat. Possibly we could secretly create a job anyway
internally if job-id is omitted, if it makes code easier.
> parameter, and integrate with the generic background jobs framework.
> This would unlock the ability to use existing commands like
> 'job-cancel', 'job-pause', 'job-resume', 'queyr-jobs' to interact
> with it.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-21 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-21 6:21 [PATCH] dump: introduce dump-cancel QMP command Hogan Wang via
2022-07-21 8:05 ` Marc-André Lureau
2022-07-21 8:13 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-07-21 10:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-07-21 11:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-21 11:25 Wangjing(Hogan) via
2022-07-22 8:56 Wangjing(Hogan) via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ytk7Sg2s5J0AgsxA@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=hogan.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).