From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: "Alberto Faria" <afaria@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.com>,
"Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy" <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>,
"Peter Lieven" <pl@kamp.de>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Xie Yongji" <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
"Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Hanna Reitz" <hreitz@redhat.com>,
"Jeff Cody" <codyprime@gmail.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Christian Schoenebeck" <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>,
"Stefan Weil" <sw@weilnetz.de>,
"Klaus Jensen" <its@irrelevant.dk>,
"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Alberto Garcia" <berto@igalia.com>,
"Michael Roth" <michael.roth@amd.com>,
"Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Konstantin Kostiuk" <kkostiuk@redhat.com>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Greg Kurz" <groug@kaod.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Amit Shah" <amit@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Raphael Norwitz" <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>,
"Ronnie Sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito" <eesposit@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Dmitry Fleytman" <dmitry.fleytman@gmail.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>, "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>,
"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 02/10] Drop unused static function return values
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 12:12:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YupYAXJTkSSwOTgV@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YupSAhFRK962i+nL@work-vm>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 11:46:26AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Alberto Faria (afaria@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Make non-void static functions whose return values are ignored by
> > all callers return void instead.
> >
> > These functions were found by static-analyzer.py.
> >
> > Not all occurrences of this problem were fixed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
>
> <snip>
>
> > diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> > index e03f698a3c..4698080f96 100644
> > --- a/migration/migration.c
> > +++ b/migration/migration.c
> > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static MigrationIncomingState *current_incoming;
> >
> > static GSList *migration_blockers;
> >
> > -static bool migration_object_check(MigrationState *ms, Error **errp);
> > +static void migration_object_check(MigrationState *ms, Error **errp);
> > static int migration_maybe_pause(MigrationState *s,
> > int *current_active_state,
> > int new_state);
> > @@ -4485,15 +4485,15 @@ static void migration_instance_init(Object *obj)
> > * Return true if check pass, false otherwise. Error will be put
> > * inside errp if provided.
> > */
> > -static bool migration_object_check(MigrationState *ms, Error **errp)
> > +static void migration_object_check(MigrationState *ms, Error **errp)
> > {
>
> I'm not sure if this is a good change.
> Where we have a function that returns an error via an Error ** it's
> normal practice for us to return a bool to say whether it generated an
> error.
>
> Now, in our case we only call it with error_fatal:
>
> migration_object_check(current_migration, &error_fatal);
>
> so the bool isn't used/checked.
>
> So I'm a bit conflicted:
>
> a) Using error_fatal is the easiest way to handle this function
> b) Things taking Error ** normally do return a flag value
> c) But it's not used in this case.
Yep, migration_object_check is following our recommended design
pattern for error reporting. It is valid to either check the
return value, or pass error_fatal / error_abort.
The fact that no /current/ callers happen to check the return
value is not a reason to make it 'void'.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-29 13:00 [RFC v2 00/10] Introduce an extensible static analyzer Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 01/10] Add " Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 02/10] Drop unused static function return values Alberto Faria
2022-08-03 10:46 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-08-03 11:07 ` Alberto Faria
2022-08-03 11:15 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2022-08-03 11:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-08-03 12:25 ` Peter Maydell
2022-08-03 12:47 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2022-08-12 16:29 ` Alberto Faria
2022-08-03 11:12 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-08-03 12:30 ` Peter Maydell
2022-08-12 16:01 ` Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 03/10] static-analyzer: Support adding tests to checks Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 04/10] static-analyzer: Avoid reanalyzing unmodified translation units Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 05/10] static-analyzer: Enforce coroutine_fn restrictions for direct calls Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 06/10] Fix some direct calls from non-coroutine_fn to coroutine_fn Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 07/10] static-analyzer: Enforce coroutine_fn restrictions on function pointers Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 08/10] Fix some bad coroutine_fn indirect calls and pointer assignments Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 09/10] block: Add no_coroutine_fn marker Alberto Faria
2022-07-29 13:00 ` [RFC v2 10/10] Fix some calls from coroutine_fn to no_coroutine_fn Alberto Faria
2022-08-04 11:44 ` [RFC v2 00/10] Introduce an extensible static analyzer Marc-André Lureau
2022-08-12 15:48 ` Alberto Faria
2022-08-16 7:17 ` Marc-André Lureau
2022-10-13 22:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-15 13:14 ` Christian Schoenebeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YupYAXJTkSSwOTgV@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=afaria@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=amit@kernel.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berto@igalia.com \
--cc=codyprime@gmail.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.fleytman@gmail.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kkostiuk@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).