Re: [PATCH 09/10] hw/arm/virt: Fix devicetree warnings about the SMMU node

[Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>]

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 08:45:05PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 16:51, Jean-Philippe Brucker
> <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > dt-validate reports three issues in the SMMU device-tree node:
> >
> >   smmuv3@9050000: $nodename:0: 'smmuv3@9050000' does not match '^iommu@[0-9a-f]*'
> >   smmuv3@9050000: interrupt-names: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> >         ['eventq', 'priq', 'cmdq-sync', 'gerror'] is too long
> >         'combined' was expected
> >         'gerror' was expected
> >         'gerror' is not one of ['cmdq-sync', 'priq']
> >   smmuv3@9050000: 'clock-names', 'clocks' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> >   From schema: linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.yaml
> >
> > Fix them by:
> > * changing the node name
> > * reordering the IRQs
> > * removing the clock properties which are not expected for the SMMU node
> 
> Why does dt-validate insist on a fixed interrupt order here?

I think the binding can be relaxed, since the driver must always look at
interrupt-names and can't assume a specific order (given that all except
gerror are now optional).

Thanks,
Jean