From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Cc: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dinechin@redhat.com,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] module: add Error arguments to module_load_one and module_load_qom_one
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:37:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yyw61MdawM2wkfiQ@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df4c09e9-addf-c643-6da0-62a6cf94b349@suse.de>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 9/22/22 11:31, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:20:07AM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> >> On 9/22/22 10:28, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Another interface that does: return -1 for error, 0 for module not found
> >>>> (no error), and 1 for loaded.
> >>>
> >>> IMHO this pattern is generally easier to understand when looking at
> >>> the callers, as the fatal error scenario is always clear.
> >>>
> >>> That said I would suggest neither approach as the public facing
> >>> API. Rather stop trying to overload 3 states onto an error reporting
> >>> pattern that inherantly wants to be 2 states. Instead just have
> >>> distinct methods
> >>>
> >>> bool module_load_one(const char *prefix, const char *name, Error *errp)
> >>> bool module_try_load_one(const char *prefix, const char *name, Error *errp)
> >>
> >>
> >> Here we are murking again the normal behavior and the error path.
> >>
> >> What is the meaning of try? It's not as though we would error out inside the function module_load_one,
> >> it's the _caller_ that needs to decide how to treat a return value of found/not found, and the exception (Error).
> >
> > I suggested "try" as in the g_malloc vs g_try_malloc API naming pattern,
> > where the latter ignores the OOM error condition.
> >
> > So in this case 'try' means try to load the module, but don't fail if
> > the module is missing on disk.
>
> I understand what you mean, but this is wrong in this case.
>
> We _do not fail_ in module_load_one, whether an error is present
> or not, whether a module is found or not.
Looking at the callers though, AFAIK there are only two patterns
that we need. All callers should report a fatal error if the module
exists and loading it failed eg module is from mis-matched build.
Some callers also want a failure if the module doesn't exist on
disk (module_load_one can be made todo this), but most callers
are happy to carry on if the module doesn't exist (module_try_load_one
can simply return success status if it doesn't exist).
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-22 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-08 18:30 [PATCH v4 0/3] improve error handling for module load Claudio Fontana
2022-09-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] module: removed unused function argument "mayfail" Claudio Fontana
2022-09-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] module: add Error arguments to module_load_one and module_load_qom_one Claudio Fontana
2022-09-15 8:43 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-16 8:13 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-16 8:16 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-16 9:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-16 10:48 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-16 14:26 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-16 15:06 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-19 8:17 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-19 8:45 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-21 12:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-19 10:18 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
2022-09-21 12:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-21 16:03 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 6:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-22 8:28 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-22 9:20 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 9:21 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 9:27 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 9:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-22 9:34 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 10:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-09-22 12:30 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 12:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-22 12:35 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 9:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-22 9:43 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 12:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-22 12:45 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 13:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-22 13:33 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 14:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-22 15:22 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-23 5:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-23 9:40 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 13:34 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
2022-09-22 13:42 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 13:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-22 14:01 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 14:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-09-22 15:08 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 15:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-09-22 15:51 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-22 17:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-09-23 9:42 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-23 9:44 ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-25 10:35 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] accel: abort if we fail to load the accelerator plugin Claudio Fontana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yyw61MdawM2wkfiQ@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=cfontana@suse.de \
--cc=dinechin@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).