From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86: add etc/phys-bits fw_cfg file
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:24:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyxF2TNwnXaefT6u@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220922101454.1069462-1-kraxel@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:14:54PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> In case phys bits are functional and can be used by the guest (aka
> host-phys-bits=on) add a fw_cfg file carrying the value. This can
> be used by the guest firmware for address space configuration.
>
> The value in the etc/phys-bits fw_cfg file should be identical to
> the phys bits value published via cpuid leaf 0x80000008.
>
> This is only enabled for 7.2+ machine types for live migration
> compatibility reasons.
Is this going to have any implications for what mgmt apps must
take into account when selecting valid migration target hosts ?
Historically, apps have tended to ignore any checks for phys
bits between src/dst migration hosts and hoped for the best.
Will this new behaviour introduce / change any failure scenarios
where the target host has fewer phys bits than the src host, that
mgmt apps need to be made aware of ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/fw_cfg.h | 1 +
> include/hw/i386/pc.h | 1 +
> hw/i386/fw_cfg.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> hw/i386/pc.c | 5 +++++
> hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 2 ++
> hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/fw_cfg.h b/hw/i386/fw_cfg.h
> index 275f15c1c5e8..6ff198a6cb85 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/fw_cfg.h
> +++ b/hw/i386/fw_cfg.h
> @@ -26,5 +26,6 @@ FWCfgState *fw_cfg_arch_create(MachineState *ms,
> void fw_cfg_build_smbios(MachineState *ms, FWCfgState *fw_cfg);
> void fw_cfg_build_feature_control(MachineState *ms, FWCfgState *fw_cfg);
> void fw_cfg_add_acpi_dsdt(Aml *scope, FWCfgState *fw_cfg);
> +void fw_cfg_phys_bits(FWCfgState *fw_cfg);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> index c95333514ed3..bedef1ee13c1 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct PCMachineClass {
> bool enforce_aligned_dimm;
> bool broken_reserved_end;
> bool enforce_amd_1tb_hole;
> + bool phys_bits_in_fw_cfg;
>
> /* generate legacy CPU hotplug AML */
> bool legacy_cpu_hotplug;
> diff --git a/hw/i386/fw_cfg.c b/hw/i386/fw_cfg.c
> index a283785a8de4..6a1f18925725 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/fw_cfg.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/fw_cfg.c
> @@ -219,3 +219,15 @@ void fw_cfg_add_acpi_dsdt(Aml *scope, FWCfgState *fw_cfg)
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
> aml_append(scope, dev);
> }
> +
> +void fw_cfg_phys_bits(FWCfgState *fw_cfg)
> +{
> + X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(first_cpu);
> + uint64_t phys_bits = cpu->phys_bits;
> +
> + if (cpu->host_phys_bits) {
> + fw_cfg_add_file(fw_cfg, "etc/phys-bits",
> + g_memdup2(&phys_bits, sizeof(phys_bits)),
> + sizeof(phys_bits));
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index 566accf7e60a..17ecc7fe4331 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -744,6 +744,7 @@ void pc_machine_done(Notifier *notifier, void *data)
> {
> PCMachineState *pcms = container_of(notifier,
> PCMachineState, machine_done);
> + PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
> X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
>
> cxl_hook_up_pxb_registers(pcms->bus, &pcms->cxl_devices_state,
> @@ -764,6 +765,9 @@ void pc_machine_done(Notifier *notifier, void *data)
> fw_cfg_build_feature_control(MACHINE(pcms), x86ms->fw_cfg);
> /* update FW_CFG_NB_CPUS to account for -device added CPUs */
> fw_cfg_modify_i16(x86ms->fw_cfg, FW_CFG_NB_CPUS, x86ms->boot_cpus);
> + if (pcmc->phys_bits_in_fw_cfg) {
> + fw_cfg_phys_bits(x86ms->fw_cfg);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1907,6 +1911,7 @@ static void pc_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> pcmc->kvmclock_enabled = true;
> pcmc->enforce_aligned_dimm = true;
> pcmc->enforce_amd_1tb_hole = true;
> + pcmc->phys_bits_in_fw_cfg = true;
> /* BIOS ACPI tables: 128K. Other BIOS datastructures: less than 4K reported
> * to be used at the moment, 32K should be enough for a while. */
> pcmc->acpi_data_size = 0x20000 + 0x8000;
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> index 8043a250adf3..c6a4dbd5c0b0 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> @@ -447,9 +447,11 @@ DEFINE_I440FX_MACHINE(v7_2, "pc-i440fx-7.2", NULL,
>
> static void pc_i440fx_7_1_machine_options(MachineClass *m)
> {
> + PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_CLASS(m);
> pc_i440fx_7_2_machine_options(m);
> m->alias = NULL;
> m->is_default = false;
> + pcmc->phys_bits_in_fw_cfg = false;
> compat_props_add(m->compat_props, hw_compat_7_1, hw_compat_7_1_len);
> compat_props_add(m->compat_props, pc_compat_7_1, pc_compat_7_1_len);
> }
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_q35.c b/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
> index 53eda50e818c..c2b56daa1550 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
> @@ -384,8 +384,10 @@ DEFINE_Q35_MACHINE(v7_2, "pc-q35-7.2", NULL,
>
> static void pc_q35_7_1_machine_options(MachineClass *m)
> {
> + PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_CLASS(m);
> pc_q35_7_2_machine_options(m);
> m->alias = NULL;
> + pcmc->phys_bits_in_fw_cfg = false;
> compat_props_add(m->compat_props, hw_compat_7_1, hw_compat_7_1_len);
> compat_props_add(m->compat_props, pc_compat_7_1, pc_compat_7_1_len);
> }
> --
> 2.37.3
>
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-22 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 10:14 [PATCH v4] x86: add etc/phys-bits fw_cfg file Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-22 11:24 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-09-22 11:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-09-22 12:20 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-22 12:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-22 14:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-22 17:13 ` Jim Mattson
2022-09-22 19:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-22 20:33 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-23 6:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-23 6:23 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-10-07 13:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-10-10 7:30 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyxF2TNwnXaefT6u@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).