From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: thuth@redhat.com, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Inscrutable CI jobs (avocado & Travis s390 check-tcg)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:04:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyyxrNp+5XrmLi1Y@fedora> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 845 bytes --]
QEMU's avocado and Travis s390x check-tcg CI jobs fail often and I don't
know why. I think it's due to timeouts but maybe there is something
buried in the logs that I missed.
I waste time skimming through logs when merging qemu.git pull requests
and electricity is wasted on tests that don't produce useful pass/fail
output.
Here are two recent examples:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/3070754718
https://app.travis-ci.com/gitlab/qemu-project/qemu/jobs/583629583
If there are real test failures then the test output needs to be
improved so people can identify failures.
If the tests are timing out then they need to be split up and/or reduced
in duration. BTW, if it's a timeout, why are we using an internal
timeout instead of letting CI mark the job as timed out?
Any other ideas for improving these CI jobs?
Thanks,
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2022-09-22 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 19:04 Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2022-09-23 7:28 ` Inscrutable CI jobs (avocado & Travis s390 check-tcg) Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-23 7:47 ` Thomas Huth
2022-09-23 10:08 ` Alex Bennée
2022-09-29 13:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-29 13:08 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-09-29 13:16 ` Thomas Huth
2022-09-29 13:24 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyyxrNp+5XrmLi1Y@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=bleal@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).