Re: [PATCH] block: Refactor get_tmp_filename()

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 04:00:34PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> 
> At present there are two callers of get_tmp_filename() and they are
> inconsistent.
> 
> One does:
> 
>     /* TODO: extra byte is a hack to ensure MAX_PATH space on Windows. */
>     char *tmp_filename = g_malloc0(PATH_MAX + 1);
>     ...
>     ret = get_tmp_filename(tmp_filename, PATH_MAX + 1);
> 
> while the other does:
> 
>     s->qcow_filename = g_malloc(PATH_MAX);
>     ret = get_tmp_filename(s->qcow_filename, PATH_MAX);
> 
> As we can see different 'size' arguments are passed. There are also
> platform specific implementations inside the function, and this use
> of snprintf is really undesirable.
> 
> Refactor this routine by changing its signature to:
> 
>     char *get_tmp_filename(void)
> 
> and use g_file_open_tmp() for a consistent implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> ---
> 
>  include/block/block_int-common.h |  2 +-
>  block.c                          | 42 ++++++++++----------------------
>  block/vvfat.c                    |  8 +++---
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|