qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
	xieyongji@bytedance.com, chaiwen.cc@bytedance.com,
	qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>,
	Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical processors in the physical package
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 15:36:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z061AeZRyw4jwWjd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009035638.59330-1-xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>

Hi Chuang,

Could I pick this fix in my later series (with another overflow fix)?
I can help you push this fix forward :-).

Regards,
Zhao

On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 11:56:38AM +0800, Chuang Xu wrote:
> Date: Wed,  9 Oct 2024 11:56:38 +0800
> From: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v6] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical
>  processors in the physical package
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)
> 
> When QEMU is started with:
> -cpu host,migratable=on,host-cache-info=on,l3-cache=off
> -smp 180,sockets=2,dies=1,cores=45,threads=2
> 
> On Intel platform:
> CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] is defined as "max number of addressable IDs for
> logical processors in the physical package".
> 
> When executing "cpuid -1 -l 1 -r" in the guest, we obtain a value of 90 for
> CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16], whereas the expected value is 128. Additionally,
> executing "cpuid -1 -l 4 -r" in the guest yields a value of 63 for
> CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26], which matches the expected result.
> 
> As (1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) rounds up to the nearest power-of-2 integer,
> we'd beter round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2
> integer too. Otherwise we may encounter unexpected results in guest.
> 
> For example, when QEMU is started with CLI above and xtopology is disabled,
> guest kernel 5.15.120 uses CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16]/(1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) to
> calculate threads-per-core in detect_ht(). Then guest will get "90/(1+63)=1"
> as the result, even though threads-per-core should actually be 2.
> 
> And on AMD platform:
> CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] is defined as "Logical processor count". Current
> result meets our expectation.
> 
> So let us round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2 integer
> only for Intel platform to solve the unexpected result.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-03  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09  3:56 [PATCH v6] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical processors in the physical package Chuang Xu
2024-10-09  4:21 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12  7:13 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-12  8:10   ` Chuang Xu
2024-10-12  8:32     ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-12  8:56       ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12  8:21 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-12  9:28   ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12  9:35   ` Chuang Xu
2024-10-14  0:36     ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-14  1:32       ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-14  3:36       ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17  8:18         ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-17  9:03           ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-28 16:07             ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-03  7:33               ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-03 15:04                 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-03 15:35                   ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-03 15:29                 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-12-03  7:36 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-12-03  7:29   ` Chuang Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z061AeZRyw4jwWjd@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=chaiwen.cc@bytedance.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    --cc=weiguixiong@bytedance.com \
    --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    --cc=xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yinyipeng@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).