From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-rust@nongnu.org, zhao1.liu@intel.com,
junjie.mao@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/9] rust: vmstate: implement VMState for scalar types
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 14:45:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z34fAFD4d/BVZQkn@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241231002336.25931-6-pbonzini@redhat.com>
> #[macro_export]
> macro_rules! vmstate_of {
> - ($struct_name:ty, $field_name:ident $([0 .. $num:ident $(* $factor:expr)?])? $(,)?) => {
> + ($struct_name:ty, $field_name:ident $([0 .. $num:tt $(* $factor:expr)?])? $(,)?) => {
Why change ident to tt?
> $crate::bindings::VMStateField {
> name: ::core::concat!(::core::stringify!($field_name), "\0")
> .as_bytes()
> @@ -109,6 +197,11 @@ macro_rules! vmstate_of {
> $(.num_offset: $crate::offset_of!($struct_name, $num),)?
> // The calls to `call_func_with_field!` are the magic that
> // computes most of the VMStateField from the type of the field.
> + info: $crate::info_enum_to_ref!($crate::call_func_with_field!(
> + $crate::vmstate::vmstate_scalar_type,
> + $struct_name,
> + $field_name
> + )),
> ..$crate::call_func_with_field!(
> $crate::vmstate::vmstate_base,
> $struct_name,
...
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_bool, bool);
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_int8, i8);
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_int16, i16);
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_int32, i32);
missed VMS_VARRAY_INT32 :-)
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_int64, i64);
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_uint8, u8, VMS_VARRAY_UINT8);
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_uint16, u16, VMS_VARRAY_UINT16);
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_uint32, u32, VMS_VARRAY_UINT32);
If we want to expand in the future (e.g., support vmstate_info_int32_equal
and vmstate_info_int32_le), then introducing new macro variants will be
straightforward. So, fair enough.
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_uint64, u64);
What about applying this to "usize" with vmstate_info_uint64?
For array length, I think usize is also used wildly. Maybe we can add
VMS_VARRAY_UINT64 and just treat usize as u64.
> +impl_vmstate_scalar!(vmstate_info_timer, bindings::QEMUTimer);
> +
> // Pointer types using the underlying type's VMState plus VMS_POINTER
>
> macro_rules! impl_vmstate_pointer {
> --
> 2.47.1
Overall, I think it's good; the design idea is coherent.
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-31 0:23 [RFC PATCH 0/9] rust: (mostly) type safe VMState Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-31 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] rust: vmstate: add new type safe implementation Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-07 8:58 ` Zhao Liu
2025-01-07 12:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-07 14:01 ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-31 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] rust: vmstate: implement VMState for non-leaf types Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-07 15:43 ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-31 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] rust: vmstate: add varray support to vmstate_of! Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-08 3:28 ` Zhao Liu
2025-01-15 10:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-31 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] rust: vmstate: implement Zeroable for VMStateField Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-06 14:31 ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-31 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] rust: vmstate: implement VMState for scalar types Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-08 6:45 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2025-01-15 13:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-16 6:59 ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-31 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] rust: vmstate: add public utility macros to implement VMState Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-08 8:15 ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-31 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] rust: qemu_api: add vmstate_struct and vmstate_cell Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-07 16:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-31 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] rust: pl011: switch vmstate to new-style macros Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-08 8:27 ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-31 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] rust: vmstate: remove translation of C vmstate macros Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-08 8:40 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z34fAFD4d/BVZQkn@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=junjie.mao@hotmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-rust@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).