From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B703C02180 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tY3lE-0004sk-L7; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:48:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tY3l8-0004rQ-3A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:48:38 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.13]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tY3l5-0007YF-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:48:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1736948916; x=1768484916; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=AFrabdmpmcSy7/EM8FjAcZaFFEVWeqDV0byUNFgvGi0=; b=PylmOahDABp8n25iMx+7MKZ9qGe8PFt2y4hGO3en97Pvr9ULkgK0SXoT pA5cCNoyHKf6xjRFFkf+ZsKs68swzRzRByO2H8zf+m8sfhLP+WvRVV9p8 hROdjnlj04iJPu86GoYXi2AgRknaBJUMBANK1wlhOB+mcsQKKmFFycIJZ kzNhZMB7KSl8orjwabLb/YiSwdJe9Dx4rriqQAO8A+4NYjvvwWqkym/EA ClObTRX63Z//6H6fT1bu35jTtc0dkAQlpxYnBXl11Ar2EFFDKjT+TPf8n voKcRjOsedYjnlLKtrI0EVng8nWxUfAYnINX7XHEwkrvwsyoEuU+dL3Vs w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Pev8/sUBQZ+otpTIXkAR3Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dggnEU0ZSOOD8NWWS25Sfw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11316"; a="48286909" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,206,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="48286909" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jan 2025 05:48:33 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: sc7LgFwaQyyj6qHSi2tdLQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: aWcPhB69TJmclWv0wI/8qg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="105620309" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.39]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2025 05:48:30 -0800 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 22:07:22 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Igor Mammedov Cc: Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Peter Xu Subject: Re: [PULL 04/49] hw: Add QOM parentship relation with CPUs Message-ID: References: <20250112221726.30206-1-philmd@linaro.org> <20250112221726.30206-5-philmd@linaro.org> <20250113132832.049f651a@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com> <6f9225ad-edc6-4fe0-b0e6-8a93e7f50102@linaro.org> <20250114111829.2f577596@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com> <20250115141333.005ab3eb@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250115141333.005ab3eb@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.175.65.13; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -44 X-Spam_score: -4.5 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.141, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org > > I remember that this was your idea all along, and I'm not sure if you're > > also referring to my previous patches about hybrid topology :-), which I'll > > I'm sorry, I've should've reviewed it long time ago. > But it got lost in from my review queue, can you give me a pointer > to the latest you've posted, please? You are very kind, no need sorry :-). I have also been inspired by many of your previous ideas (although my work may not fully meet your expectations yet). Here are the links: [1]: qom-topo series, which tries to abstract every topology levels as devices and build a topology tree: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240919015533.766754-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com/ [2]: hybird-topo series, based on [1], which allows i386 to customize topology tree: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240919061128.769139-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com/ Thanks, Zhao