From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 711E5E77188 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 07:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tYKTZ-0005ZD-Qc; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 02:39:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tYKTH-0005W7-L7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 02:39:22 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.9]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tYKTF-0004SA-BW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 02:39:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1737013157; x=1768549157; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=yqs5Kest30XVewuxUxoRxpGiRu/K6qHIatYSRtqqR2E=; b=KEdQ6IsHtWTpK65NLHgm/NLfJuslohWJeqanJ1+eo6oop9La2zivZrRo rWk15LSv2IIwQy+OjEUbB5DlRpBg0K0+rRwE0Dmb4X1kdOI6UBh7k9d9f N0/MSuNIvJkUOy8lHlr3lLooUSzNrCTVKfMXTljgBLfwkA5KXeeTD4t13 agemip5ifDPZm9+rCEpbn+3nGHh1M2T/Zjom98LeZ/O4Vk+mN3R7MNrru qnTGmw7XJtFY1dA380EN7z/EXqbCMa0DMHv+2Vu4EbJkbnvQzrOgAopo9 V0TdqJrUdAFmGe7Z86uk4rjZgKLWoWEoWcvqAKaYA/2JxthphwG2uSPDB A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3sCXPSpDSwuojABGP4iO7Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 3g327J70TNGNoyfSwhguhg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11316"; a="48041824" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,208,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="48041824" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jan 2025 23:39:14 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0Fco6pNfSb6oJXIMBWmu/g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: IC1kyf1ISCqUzAcDKIfwjg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,208,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="105942698" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.39]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2025 23:39:12 -0800 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:58:03 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Thomas Huth Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Maydell , "Daniel P . Berrange" , "Michael S . Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/about: Change notes on x86 machine type deprecation into a general one Message-ID: References: <20250116064644.65670-1-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250116064644.65670-1-thuth@redhat.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.198.163.9; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -62 X-Spam_score: -6.3 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.141, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.793, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 07:46:44AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 07:46:44 +0100 > From: Thomas Huth > Subject: [PATCH] docs/about: Change notes on x86 machine type deprecation > into a general one > > We now have a general note about versioned machine types getting > deprecated and removed at the beginning of the deprecated.rst file, > so we should also have a general note about this in removed-features.rst > (which will also apply to versioned non-x86 machine types) instead of > listing individual old machine types in the document. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > --- > docs/about/deprecated.rst | 7 ------- > docs/about/removed-features.rst | 11 +++++------ > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > Sounds good to me, so: Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu Let's see if others have any feedback :-)