From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0CFC02194 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tfFgz-0000kx-Av; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 04:58:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tfFgw-0000kP-WF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 04:58:03 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tfFgv-0007cg-Bk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 04:58:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1738663079; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6wOfD6wl8HRJmdVvw6Fl4fJc9lI2o+gjYGu99zpcPkQ=; b=a8av0UPASQazVQbF/TUF6WzbyvJAxuASw6qjqzYi97TzWUrBm4uqgnomg/wB3LPPUxSnAN gMVoj2lYgnvFAdyJNYOEK4rfJkXnhGERa1I+WIyuzNEjBoEHJVcUFUMjW5LSgTGVF0AUGs NbGUX7/QTzz6l9kVLPRwi94tj0MNabs= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-286-7rxGVZBqP9Cr7qKpixcgwQ-1; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 04:57:53 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 7rxGVZBqP9Cr7qKpixcgwQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 7rxGVZBqP9Cr7qKpixcgwQ Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4AAF195608A; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.60]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DAAC1956095; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:57:40 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, BALATON Zoltan , Laurent Vivier , Ovchinnikov Vitalii , Jared Mauch , Fabiano Rosas , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , devel@lists.libvirt.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] hw/arm/raspi: Deprecate old raspiX machine names Message-ID: References: <20250204002240.97830-1-philmd@linaro.org> <20250204002240.97830-12-philmd@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.13 (2024-03-09) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:51:04AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 4/2/25 10:22, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 00:23, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > > > > > All previous raspi machines can be created using the > > > generic machine. Deprecate the old names to maintain > > > a single one. Update the tests. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > > > > > diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > > > index 4a3c302962a..c9a11a52f78 100644 > > > --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst > > > +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > > > @@ -257,6 +257,19 @@ Big-Endian variants of MicroBlaze ``petalogix-ml605`` and ``xlnx-zynqmp-pmu`` ma > > > Both ``petalogix-ml605`` and ``xlnx-zynqmp-pmu`` were added for little endian > > > CPUs. Big endian support is not tested. > > > > > > +ARM ``raspi0``, ``raspi1ap``, ``raspi2b``, ``raspi3ap``, ``raspi3b`` and ``raspi4b`` machines (since 10.0) > > > +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > > + > > > +The Raspberry Pi machines have been unified under the generic ``raspi`` machine, > > > +which takes the model as argument. > > > + > > > + - `raspi0`` is now an alias for ``raspi,model=Zero`` > > > + - `raspi1ap`` is now an alias for ``raspi,model=1A+`` > > > + - `raspi2b`` is now an alias for ``raspi,model=2B`` > > > + - `raspi3ap`` is now an alias for ``raspi,model=3A+`` > > > + - `raspi3b`` is now an alias for ``raspi,model=3B`` > > > + - `raspi4b`` is now an alias for ``raspi,model=4B`` > > > > This is not how we typically handle "we have a bunch > > of different devboards in one family". What's wrong with the > > existing set of machine names? > > Zoltan and you don't want to add more machine names, then you > don't want a generic machine. This is very confusing. IMHO we can have distinct machines for each model, but *NOT* have further machines for each RAM size within a model. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|