qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
	Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/5] i386/kvm: Support event with select & umask format in KVM PMU filter
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:42:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6SEIqhJEWrMWTU1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6SG2NLxxhz4adlV@intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 05:54:32PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:07:10AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 11:07:10 +0100
> > From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/5] i386/kvm: Support event with select & umask
> >  format in KVM PMU filter
> > 
> > Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com> writes:
> > 
> > > The select&umask is the common way for x86 to identify the PMU event,
> > > so support this way as the "x86-default" format in kvm-pmu-filter
> > > object.
> > 
> > So, format 'raw' lets you specify the PMU event code as a number, wheras
> > 'x86-default' lets you specify it as select and umask, correct?
> 
> Yes!
> 
> > Why do we want both?
> 
> This 2 formats are both wildly used in x86(for example, in perf tool).
> 
> x86 documents usually specify the umask and select fields.
> 
> But raw format could also be applied for ARM since ARM just uses a number
> to encode event.
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > diff --git a/qapi/kvm.json b/qapi/kvm.json
> > > index d51aeeba7cd8..93b869e3f90c 100644
> > > --- a/qapi/kvm.json
> > > +++ b/qapi/kvm.json
> > > @@ -27,11 +27,13 @@
> > >  #
> > >  # @raw: the encoded event code that KVM can directly consume.
> > >  #
> > > +# @x86-default: standard x86 encoding format with select and umask.
> > 
> > Why is this named -default?
> 
> Intel and AMD both use umask+select to encode events, but this format
> doesn't have a name... so I call it `default`, or what about
> "x86-umask-select"?
> 
> > > +#
> > >  # Since 10.0
> > >  ##
> > >  { 'enum': 'KVMPMUEventEncodeFmt',
> > >    'prefix': 'KVM_PMU_EVENT_FMT',
> > > -  'data': ['raw'] }
> > > +  'data': ['raw', 'x86-default'] }
> > >  
> > >  ##
> > >  # @KVMPMURawEvent:
> > > @@ -46,6 +48,25 @@
> > >  { 'struct': 'KVMPMURawEvent',
> > >    'data': { 'code': 'uint64' } }
> > >  
> > > +##
> > > +# @KVMPMUX86DefalutEvent:
> > 
> > Default, I suppose.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > > +#
> > > +# x86 PMU event encoding with select and umask.
> > > +# raw_event = ((select & 0xf00UL) << 24) | \
> > > +#              (select) & 0xff) | \
> > > +#              ((umask) & 0xff) << 8)
> > 
> > Sphinx rejects this with "Unexpected indentation."
> > 
> > Is the formula needed here?
> 
> I tried to explain the relationship between raw format and umask+select.
> 
> Emm, where do you think is the right place to put the document like
> this?
> 
> ...
> 
> > > +##
> > > +# @KVMPMUX86DefalutEventVariant:

Typo   s/Defalut/Default/ - repeated many times in this patch.

> > > +#
> > > +# The variant of KVMPMUX86DefalutEvent with the string, rather than
> > > +# the numeric value.
> > > +#
> > > +# @select: x86 PMU event select field.  This field is a 12-bit
> > > +#     unsigned number string.
> > > +#
> > > +# @umask: x86 PMU event umask field. This field is a uint8 string.
> > 
> > Why are these strings?  How are they parsed into numbers?
> 
> In practice, the values associated with PMU events (code for arm, select&
> umask for x86) are often expressed in hexadecimal. Further, from linux
> perf related information (tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/*/*/*.json), x86/
> arm64/riscv/nds32/powerpc all prefer the hexadecimal numbers and only
> s390 uses decimal value.
> 
> Therefore, it is necessary to support hexadecimal in order to honor PMU
> conventions.

IMHO having a data format that matches an arbitrary external tool is not
a goal for QMP. It should be neutral and exclusively use the normal JSON
encoding, ie base-10 decimal. Yes, this means a user/client may have to
convert from hex to dec before sending data over QMP. This is true of
many areas of QMP/QEMU config though and thus normal/expected behaviour.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-06  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-22  9:05 [RFC v2 0/5] accel/kvm: Support KVM PMU filter Zhao Liu
2025-01-22  9:05 ` [RFC v2 1/5] qapi/qom: Introduce kvm-pmu-filter object Zhao Liu
2025-02-05 10:03   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-02-06 10:19     ` Zhao Liu
2025-02-06 10:27       ` Zhao Liu
2025-02-06 12:13       ` Markus Armbruster
2025-02-06 14:32         ` Zhao Liu
2025-02-07 13:02           ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-01  7:47             ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-08  5:51               ` Markus Armbruster
2025-01-22  9:05 ` [RFC v2 2/5] i386/kvm: Support basic KVM PMU filter Zhao Liu
2025-01-22  9:05 ` [RFC v2 3/5] i386/kvm: Support event with select & umask format in " Zhao Liu
2025-02-05 10:07   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-02-06  9:54     ` Zhao Liu
2025-02-06  9:42       ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-02-06 10:23         ` Zhao Liu
2025-02-06 10:24         ` Markus Armbruster
2025-02-06 14:22           ` Zhao Liu
2025-02-06 14:54             ` Zhao Liu
2025-02-07 13:06               ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-01  7:53                 ` Zhao Liu
2025-01-22  9:05 ` [RFC v2 4/5] i386/kvm: Support event with masked entry " Zhao Liu
2025-01-22  9:05 ` [RFC v2 5/5] i386/kvm: Support fixed counter " Zhao Liu
2025-01-24  8:00 ` [RFC v2 0/5] accel/kvm: Support " Lai, Yi
2025-03-18  7:35 ` Shaoqin Huang
2025-03-21  3:43   ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-31  6:32     ` Shaoqin Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6SEIqhJEWrMWTU1@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eauger@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sebott@redhat.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).