Re: [PATCH 01/11] rust: Build separate qemu_api_tools and qemu_api_system

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 12.02.2025 um 11:01 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 2/11/25 22:43, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > The existing qemu_api library can't be linked into tools because it
> > contains a few bindings for things that only exist in the system
> > emulator.
> > 
> > This adds a new "system" feature to the qemu_api crate that enables the
> > system emulator parts in it, and build the crate twice: qemu_api_tools
> > is the core library that can be linked into tools, and qemu_api_system
> > is the full one for the system emulator.
> 
> As discussed on IRC, the issue here is ClassInitImpl<>, which has to be
> defined in the same crate for qemu_api::qom and qemu_api::qdev.
> 
> Right now, the block layer has no use for QOM, but later it will (for secret
> management, for example), so splitting QOM into a separate crate does not
> work long term.
> 
> I'll try to figure out an alternative way to do the class_init bindings.

There were more problems with splitting the qemu_api crate related to
bindgen. Basically, you would want the system emulator bindings to
contain only those things that aren't already part of the common
bindings. But the system emulator headers will obviously include common
headers, too, so this becomes tricky.

If you don't do this, you get two bindings for the same type, but the
binding types won't be compatible with each other etc.

This approach of just building two separate libraries was a lot easier.
Apart from the obvious inefficiency, I just hate the need for
rust_dependency_map everywhere to make the library show up with the
neutral 'qemu_api' name in both cases. Maybe there is a better approach
where this could be defined for the library itself rather than for each
user, but I couldn't find one. meson is still black magic to me.

Kevin