From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C39C021BB for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tmtjL-0003Eo-85; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:08:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tmtjH-0003EL-4f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:08:03 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tmtjF-0007IY-1R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:08:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1740485278; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=6ZgxtuOMITS8yBIkZ+uTwdlV6OGrCH+EuUshJ2LD8ks=; b=JUZcEHhbOWzrUsigBQ1Kw7K0Q5D4z7qZWrrsiwl443v1vU4pfcL5Y/xwMCly0e5WuHBL8g 1T5LPcParF4tNsDFAVq8qLRTXyw2a248nRjNvrgybM63U321gR8Z06u2laYEeZBB9SkTX9 2vHLzQvvqyfJnzPSd62WXnayvvAZxfg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-74-CSGe9IqmNmK5MZRpjzT9LQ-1; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:07:54 -0500 X-MC-Unique: CSGe9IqmNmK5MZRpjzT9LQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: CSGe9IqmNmK5MZRpjzT9LQ_1740485273 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A391B1800998; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.59]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3A871800359; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:07:47 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Cleber Rosa , Paolo Bonzini , John Snow Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] python: integrate linter tests natively with meson Message-ID: References: <20250224191152.2123003-1-berrange@redhat.com> <87y0xud0h0.fsf@pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y0xud0h0.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.13 (2024-03-09) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.443, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 07:04:11AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > John, how does this mix with the linting parts of your "[PATCH 00/10] > qapi: misc testing and doc patches"? Since this is only an RFC, I would expect that John's patch series can simply ignore this & merge when ready. If we decide to turn this into a non-RFC series, than we can figure out the resolution at that point. At a quick glance, I don't see anything John's done in his series that would complicate life for this proposal in any notable way. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|