From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
mtosatti@redhat.com, sandipan.das@amd.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
likexu@tencent.com, like.xu.linux@gmail.com,
zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, groug@kaod.org, khorenko@virtuozzo.com,
alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com, den@virtuozzo.com,
davydov-max@yandex-team.ru, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, joe.jin@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] target/i386/kvm: query kvm.enable_pmu parameter
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:14:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z86DXK0MAuC+mP/Y@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250302220112.17653-8-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 02:00:15PM -0800, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 14:00:15 -0800
> From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 07/10] target/i386/kvm: query kvm.enable_pmu parameter
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.5
>
> There is no way to distinguish between the following scenarios:
>
> (1) KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is not supported.
> (2) KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is supported but disabled via the module
> parameter kvm.enable_pmu=N.
>
> In scenario (1), there is no way to fully disable AMD PMU virtualization.
>
> In scenario (2), PMU virtualization is completely disabled by the KVM
> module.
KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is introduced since ba7bb663f554 ("KVM: x86:
Provide per VM capability for disabling PMU virtualization") in v5.18,
so I understand you want to handle the old linux before v5.18.
Let's sort out all the cases:
1) v5.18 and after, if the parameter "enable_pmu" is Y and then
KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY exists, so everything could work.
2) v5.18 and after, "enable_pmu" is N and then KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY
doesn't exist, QEMU needs to helpe user disable vPMU.
3) v5.17 (since "enable_pmu" is introduced in v5.17 since 4732f2444acd
("KVM: x86: Making the module parameter of vPMU more common")),
there's no KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY and vPMU enablement depends on
"enable_pmu". QEMU's enable_pmu option should depend on kvm
parameter.
4) before v5.17, there's no "enable_pmu" so that there's no way to
fully disable AMD PMU.
IIUC, you want to distinguish 2) and 3). And your current codes won't
break old kernels on 4) because "kvm_pmu_disabled" defaults false.
Therefore, overall the idea of this patch is good for me.
But IMO, the logics all above can be compatible by:
* First check the KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY,
* Only if KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY doesn't exist, then check the kvm parameter
...instead of always checking the parameter as you are currently doing.
What about this change? :-)
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
index 4902694129f9..9a6044e41a82 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -2055,13 +2055,34 @@ int kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
* behavior on Intel platform because current "pmu" property works
* as expected.
*/
- if (has_pmu_cap && !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
- ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
- KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
- if (ret < 0) {
- error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
- "Failed to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE");
- return ret;
+ if (has_pmu_cap) {
+ if (!X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
+ ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
+ KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
+ "Failed to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is introduced in Linux v5.18. For old linux,
+ * we have to check enable_pmu parameter for vPMU support.
+ */
+ g_autofree char *kvm_enable_pmu;
+
+ /*
+ * The kvm.enable_pmu's permission is 0444. It does not change until a
+ * reload of the KVM module.
+ */
+ if (g_file_get_contents("/sys/module/kvm/parameters/enable_pmu",
+ &kvm_enable_pmu, NULL, NULL)) {
+ if (*kvm_enable_pmu == 'N' && !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
+ error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable PMU since "
+ "KVM's enable_pmu parameter is disabled");
+ return -1;
+ }
}
}
}
---
This example not only eliminates the static variable “kvm_pmu_disabled”,
but also explicitly informs the user that vPMU is not available and
QEMU's "pmu" option doesn't work.
As a comparison, your patch 8 actually "silently" disables PMU (in the
kvm_init_pmu_info()) and user can only find it in Guest through PMU
exceptions.
Thanks,
Zhao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-02 22:00 [PATCH v2 00/10] target/i386/kvm/pmu: PMU Enhancement, Bugfix and Cleanup Dongli Zhang
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] target/i386: disable PerfMonV2 when PERFCORE unavailable Dongli Zhang
2025-03-04 14:40 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-03-04 22:53 ` dongli.zhang
2025-03-05 1:38 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-03-05 14:20 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-07 7:24 ` Sandipan Das
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] target/i386: disable PERFCORE when "-pmu" is configured Dongli Zhang
2025-03-03 1:59 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-03-03 18:45 ` dongli.zhang
2025-03-04 6:11 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-03-06 16:50 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-06 17:47 ` dongli.zhang
2025-03-07 7:41 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] [DO NOT MERGE] kvm: Introduce kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu() Dongli Zhang
2025-03-05 14:46 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-05 21:53 ` dongli.zhang
2025-03-07 7:52 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-07 8:40 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] target/i386/kvm: set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE if "-pmu" is configured Dongli Zhang
2025-03-04 7:59 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-03-05 1:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-05 1:35 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-03-05 14:41 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-05 20:13 ` dongli.zhang
2025-03-05 14:44 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] target/i386/kvm: extract unrelated code out of kvm_x86_build_cpuid() Dongli Zhang
2025-03-05 7:03 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-03-07 9:15 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-07 22:47 ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-10 3:55 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] target/i386/kvm: rename architectural PMU variables Dongli Zhang
2025-03-05 7:07 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-03-07 9:19 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-07 22:49 ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] target/i386/kvm: query kvm.enable_pmu parameter Dongli Zhang
2025-03-10 6:14 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2025-03-10 15:41 ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-10 16:49 ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] target/i386/kvm: reset AMD PMU registers during VM reset Dongli Zhang
2025-03-05 7:33 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-03-05 11:41 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-03-05 19:05 ` dongli.zhang
2025-03-07 7:38 ` Sandipan Das
2025-03-10 7:47 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-10 16:39 ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-11 13:51 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-11 19:52 ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-12 8:30 ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-12 22:17 ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-28 6:29 ` ewanhai
2025-03-28 16:42 ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31 3:55 ` ewanhai
2025-03-31 19:16 ` Dongli Zhang
2025-04-01 3:35 ` Ewan Hai
2025-04-07 8:51 ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-07 9:33 ` Ewan Hai
2025-04-16 8:17 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] target/i386/kvm: support perfmon-v2 for reset Dongli Zhang
2025-03-02 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] target/i386/kvm: don't stop Intel PMU counters Dongli Zhang
2025-03-05 7:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-03-05 19:00 ` dongli.zhang
2025-03-06 1:38 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z86DXK0MAuC+mP/Y@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davydov-max@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).