From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: gerben@altlinux.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, hreitz@redhat.com, sdl.qemu@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/vmdk: prevent double-free in extent memory management
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:35:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z87Afzk_3r6ft_J4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304090415.39393-1-gerben@altlinux.org>
Am 04.03.2025 um 10:04 hat gerben@altlinux.org geschrieben:
> From: Denis Rastyogin <gerben@altlinux.org>
>
> This error was discovered by fuzzing qemu-img.
>
> A double-free issue in the VMDK driver occurs when handling snapshots.
> The memory allocated for extent structures is freed twice: first in
> vmdk_close (block/vmdk.c) and then in vmdk_add_extent (block/vmdk.c).
>
> The fix ensures the s->extents pointer is set to NULL after freeing,
> preventing double-free.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2853
> Signed-off-by: Denis Rastyogin <gerben@altlinux.org>
> ---
> block/vmdk.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/vmdk.c b/block/vmdk.c
> index 2adec49912..d6baa54602 100644
> --- a/block/vmdk.c
> +++ b/block/vmdk.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ static void vmdk_free_extents(BlockDriverState *bs)
> bdrv_graph_wrunlock();
>
> g_free(s->extents);
> + s->extents = NULL;
> }
This is not the right fix. It only papers over the real bug, which is
that bdrv_snapshot_goto() calls .bdrv_open() for a BlockDriverState
whose bs->opaque hasn't been zeroed. Open functions of block drivers
generally rely on having a zeroed state.
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 9:04 [PATCH] block/vmdk: prevent double-free in extent memory management gerben
2025-03-10 10:35 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z87Afzk_3r6ft_J4@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=gerben@altlinux.org \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sdl.qemu@linuxtesting.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).